someone on suttacentral asked:
How to handle difference between Pali and Agama sutra parallels?
The answer, if you're Bhikkhu Sujato or Analayo,
is pick the school that supports your biased agenda,
regard that as "legitimate",
and claim the other school made a "transmission error".
MN 125 Sujato doubles down on fraudulent interpretation of vitakka in jhāna
MN 117 Sujato's fraudulent/criminal interpretation of 'vitakka' is based on this sutta
MN 44 Sujato's fraudulent interpretation of 'vitakka' in jhāna via conflating vācā (speech) and vacī-sankhāra (speech co-activities)
Also, use fallacious tactics of cherry picking and sophistry,
MN 125 Sujato doubles down on fraudulent interpretation of vitakka in jhāna
MN 117 Sujato's fraudulent/criminal interpretation of 'vitakka' is based on this sutta
MN 44 Sujato's fraudulent interpretation of 'vitakka' in jhāna via conflating vācā (speech) and vacī-sankhāra (speech co-activities)
Also, use fallacious tactics of cherry picking and sophistry,
with some ostrich maneuvering, pretending the parallel that disagrees with you doesn't even exist.
MN 19 and agama || MA 102 two sorts of thoughts in first jhāna, and out, even Abhidhamma does not contradict this, what are Sujato and Brahm 'thinking'?
MN 19 and agama || MA 102 two sorts of thoughts in first jhāna, and out, even Abhidhamma does not contradict this, what are Sujato and Brahm 'thinking'?
Building a straw man
Cherry Picking
Eel wriggling
Related
Critical Thinking 101
Comments
Post a Comment