Skip to main content

AN 4.14: what kind of evil Dharmas did the Buddha have in mind?

 
For the 2nd of 4 categories of right effort, the one for abandoning (pahāna),
The first 3 types of thoughts that should be abandoned,
 are the 3 opposites of right resolve: thoughts of sensuality, ill will, harming.
What about the 4th category, that serves as a catch all?
The 3 wrong resolves correspond to the first 2 of 5 hindrances.
So this last category represents all 5 hindrances, 
as well as any other miscellaneous evil unskillful Dharma not covered by 5 hindrances.
Similar to how first line of the first jhāna formula first mentions sensuality, 
and then just a category "unskillful dharmas".

[2.4 thoughts of evil un-skillful Dharmas]


uppannuppanne pāpake akusale dhamme
At the very moment a monk notices a thought of evil un-skillful Dharmas arising,
nādhivāseti
he does not tolerate it.
pajahati
He abandons it.
vinodeti
He removes it.
byantīkaroti
He destroys it.
anabhāvaṃ gameti;
He annihilates [that thought of evil unskillful Dharma].
[The abandoning of the 4 categories of wrong thought]
Idaṃ vuccati, bhikkhave, pahānappadhānaṃ.
is called the exertion of abandoning.


What are evil and/or unskillful Dharmas not covered by 5 hindrances?

Are they worth mentioning, if they aren't important enough to justify having their own category in 5 hindrances?
If you want to commit genocide, become dictator of the land, do those deserve their own category,
or are they simply combination platters of the hindrance of ill will and sensual desire?
If you have a thought (based on wrong view) of "my soul is eternal",
Is that evil (pāpa), or only unskillful (akusala)?

Tangent question

When people translate "pāpake akusale dhamme" as "evil unskillful dharmas",
shouldn't we make a distinction between "evil" and "unskillful"? 
As in the example above, I would say thoughts of "my eternal soul" are unskillful but not evil,
but thoughts of genocide and conquering the land with military force is "evil".

Better translation: "Evil OR unskillful Dharmas"?























Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lucid24.org: What's new?

Link to lucid24.org home page :    4👑☸   Remember, you may have to click the refresh button on your web browser navigation bar at to get updated website. 2024 9-17 Lots of new stuff in the last 2 and a half years.  Too many to list. Main one justifying new blog entry, is redesign of home page. Before, it was designed to please me, super dense with everything in one master control panel. I've redesigned it to be friendly to newbies and everyone really. Clear structure, more use of space.  At someone's request, I added a lucid24.org google site search at top of home page. 2022 4-14 Major update to lucid24.org, easy navigation of suttas, quicklink: the ramifications 4-2 new feature lucid24.org sutta quick link 3-28 A new translation of SN 38.16, and first jhāna is a lot easier than you think 🔗📝notes related to Jhāna force and J.A.S.I. effect AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm and Sujato's "Jhāna" work here? 3-13 Added to EBPedia J.A.S.I. ('Jazzy...
3 comments
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a...
Post a Comment
Read more