Skip to main content

New translation of first two verses of KN Dhp Dhammapada

SP-FLUENT style translation

Meaning the priority of this translation is to spell out the meaning of the suttas fluently.

No attempt is made to try to mimic any poetic features of verse in Dhammapada.


KN Dhp 1:

♦ 1.
♦ mano-pubbaį¹…gamā dhammā,
Mind precedes dharma [which are raw mental sensory data to the mind, or fully formed concepts like the Buddha's Dharma].
mano-seį¹­į¹­hā mano-mayā.
Mind is their chief; they are all mind-made.
♦ manasā ce pa-duį¹­į¹­hena,
If the mind contains anger or any impurity
bhāsati vā karoti vā.
when it speaks or acts,
♦ tato naį¹ƒ dukkham-anveti,
then pain-&-suffering follows him,
cakkaį¹ƒva vahato padaį¹ƒ.
like the wheel that-follows the foot of the ox.

KN Dhp 2:

♦ 2.
♦ mano-pubbaį¹…gamā dhammā,
Mind precedes dharma [which are raw mental sensory data to the mind, or fully formed concepts like the Buddha's Dharma].
mano-seį¹­į¹­hā mano-mayā.
Mind is their chief; they are all mind-made.
♦ manasā ce pasannena,
If the mind is pure when it
bhāsati vā karoti vā.
speaks or acts,
♦ tato naį¹ƒ sukham-anveti,
then pleasure follows him,
chāyāva an-apāyinī VAR.
like his shadow never-departing.





FLIPT translation (word for word pāįø·i to english)

KN Dhp 1:

♦ 1.
♦ mano-pubbaį¹…gamā dhammā,
Mind-precedes (all) dharmas.
mano-seį¹­į¹­hā mano-mayā.
Mind-(is their)-chief; (they are all) mind-made.
♦ manasā ce pa-duį¹­į¹­hena,
(the) mind, if, with-impurity,
bhāsati vā karoti vā.
speaks or acts **,
♦ tato naį¹ƒ dukkham-anveti,
then *** suffering-follows (him),
cakkaį¹ƒva vahato padaį¹ƒ.
(like the) wheel that-follows (the) foot (of the ox).

KN Dhp 2:

♦ 2.
♦ mano-pubbaį¹…gamā dhammā,
Mind-precedes (all) dharmas.
mano-seį¹­į¹­hā mano-mayā.
Mind-(is their)-chief; (they are all) mind-made.
♦ manasā ce pasannena,
(the) mind, if, with-purity,
bhāsati vā karoti vā.
speaks or acts **,
♦ tato naį¹ƒ sukham-anveti,
then *** pleasure-follows (him),
chāyāva an-apāyinī VAR.
(like his) shadow never-departing.


Translation Notes


MN 117 has pubbangamā as right view

Tatra, bhikkhave, sammādiį¹­į¹­hi pubbaį¹…gamā hoti.
In this context, right view comes first.
KathaƱca, bhikkhave, sammādiį¹­į¹­hi pubbaį¹…gamā hoti?
And how does right view come first?
Micchādiį¹­į¹­hiį¹ƒ ‘micchādiį¹­į¹­hÄ«’ti pajānāti, sammādiį¹­į¹­hiį¹ƒ ‘sammādiį¹­į¹­hÄ«’ti pajānāti—sāssa hoti sammādiį¹­į¹­hi.
When you understand wrong view as wrong view and right view as right view, that’s your right view.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex