Skip to main content

The Jhāna passaddhi 'force' equation, and the simile of Ajahn Brahm and the golden goose

Simile of the golden goose 

People tend to be scared of math, so I'll start off with an intuitive simile to illustrate the purpose of the 'force' equation.

Suppose you're lucky enough to follow a correct EBT interpretation of jhana and  satipatthana ("mindfulness meditation").

Then you know that sati ("mindful" of relevant Dharma to apply every moment) and jhana are not mutually exclusive practices, as LBT Theravada wrongly promulgates, but that they are in fact completely integrated, aspects of  the same moment to moment meditation you should be doing all day, every day 24/7.  Sati should always be active. You're in grave danger whenever sati is not active. 

The 4 jhanas are 4 quality levels of sati.  If you can do jhana, but do sati every moment without applying your passaddhi (pacification) and jhana skill, it's beyond foolish. 

If you are skilled in Jhana, it's like you own a smart and loyal companion who's always with you, laying golden eggs continuously, like every minute or so. All you have to do, if you have any common sense, is collect the eggs and store them in your treasure chest of accumulated spiritual capital (the currency/money you need to realize arahantship and higher knowledges).  




To do sati all the time, without doing jhana quality of samadhi along with that sati, would be like not collecting all those free golden eggs your friend is producing every minute. That would be foolish wouldn't it? 


Simile of what LBT Theravada, Visuddhimagga and Ajahn Brahm do to that golden goose





Since they promulgate a system of jhana that is mutually exclusive from sati practice, it prevents people from even trying to accumulate spiritual wealth all day, in all 4 postures of activity. They don't even know that you can do partial jhana and passaddhi while you do sati every moment. 


The 4 jhanas are 4 quality levels of sati.  If you can do jhana, but do sati every moment without applying your passaddhi (pacification) and jhana skill, it's beyond foolish. But this is exactly what Vism. and Ajahn Brahm are telling you to do, by redefining jhana into a disembodied frozen stupor that in practice can only be done in a sitting posture under intensive silent retreat conditions.


Is that corrupted redefinition of jhana what you really want to do, or would you rather follow a correct EBT interpretation of jhana and sati, which are done simultaneously all the time, all day? You should  always be charging your jhana battery, always baking PIE, always collecting those golden eggs in all 4 postures in all activities. 


The size of the eggs laid every minute varies according to the 'force' equation. 



The Jhāna passaddhi 'force' equation


Loaded Zen: Baking PIE, getting rich by maximizing the zen coefficient every moment


PIE = ∫ zen × zc × activity × ac 

from t = 0 (time of birth) to t = time of death

zen [1,4] = first jhana to fourth jhana, your baseline samadhi skill level, i.e. when you flip the switch which zen are you typically in. Ordinary person below zen 1, let's call 0.5.

zc [0.0,1.0] = zen coefficient 

activity [-∞️, +∞️]:

+∞️ positive activity like noble silence + 4sp satipatthana + 4bv brahmavihara, 

-∞️ negative activity based on 5niv hindrances mostly kāma sensuality based that drain exorbitant amounts of vital internal energy.


ac = activity coefficient = force × current × pacification  ÷ tension

tension [0,+∞️]: you can see from equation having zero tension will make your activity coefficient an infinite number, while having maximum tension will drag your ac score to zero, and your moment to moment PIE yield to zero.


Problems with this equation: 

1. Many of the variables are not independent

2. There really should be exponential growth expressed somewhere


simile: golden goose always with you. The higher your zen coefficient and activity coefficient, the bigger the golden egg he lays, every minute. Golden egg filled with PIE. 


Related


🔗📝 notes on passadhi (pacification) and force


Comments

  1. what is EBT? and What is LBT Theravada?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice formula... what is "current" in this case? The cleanliness of your chi channels?
    Is tension the physical component of stress while pacification is the mental component?
    This formula is probably worth an hour discussion. :D

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex