Skip to main content

Why do the noble ones single out third jhāna for praise? Why not 4th jhāna or first?

 


3. With rapture fading,
he meditates equanimously observing,
🐘💭 remembering [and applying relevant ☸Dharma], he lucidly discerns.
He experiences pleasure with the body.
The Noble Ones praise this [stage of zen]:
"Equanimously observing and remembering [to engage in relevant ☸Dharma], they have a pleasurable abiding."
He enters and dwells in the third stage of zen (j3🌖).

🚫😁 pītiyā ca virāgā
🚫😁(with) Rapture ** fading,
👁 upekkhako ca viharati
👁 Equanimously-observing ** (he) dwells,
(S&S🐘💭) sato ca sam-pajāno,
(S&S🐘💭) (he is a) Rememberer, (a) lucid-discerner,
🙂🚶 sukhañca kāyena paṭi-saṃ-vedeti,
🙂🚶 pleasure with-the-body (he) experiences,
yaṃ taṃ ariyā ācikkhanti —
that those Noble-Ones declare -
‘upekkhako satimā sukha-vihārī’ti
“(He is an) equanimous-observer (and a) Rememberer, (he has) pleasurable-abiding.”
🌖 tatiyaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja viharati.
🌖 third Jhāna (he) enters, dwells.


Why do the noble ones single out third jhāna for praise? Why not 4th jhāna or first?


1.  third jhana is the baseline level of passadhi and samadhi most of his disciples will be able to wield in their every day all around satipatthana 24/7 practice. 

It's because third jhana is the baseline level of passadhi (pacification awakening factor) and samadhi that the Buddha expects from his ordained monastics. 


For lay people who keep 5 precepts well, a decent first jhana with a ceiling of mediocre second jhana is his expectation level. 

See article for proof: 🔗Don't give up on jhāna, till you drink from the sutta cup

(especially the sutta passages for AN 5 and DN 18)


Since ordained monastics keep 8 precepts, pure celibacy that prevents draining their jhana battery, keeping noble silence charges up their jhana battery so the expected level of jhana proficiency is 3rd jhana. 




2. because S&S🐘💭 (sati & sampajano) are not listed as jhana factors until 3rd jhana


@bath_powder wrote:

Maybe it's the inclusion of sati-sampajanna here that makes it worthy of praise? Some scholars such as Alexander Wynne and Richard Gombrich have suggested that the third and fourth jhana are fundamentally different than the first two and represent a transition to mindful observation of the sense spheres inside a jhanic state of mind. The third could be praised instead of the fourth simply because it's the first place this occurs in this understanding.



@frankk:

That's a legitimate reason too. There can be many reasons for why 3rd jhana is singled out, and those reasons need not be mutually exclusive.


Piti and sukha can be very intense in 2nd jhana, when you're first being very proficient in that, and  you'd be a lot less likely to or even able to walk around all day doing maintaining 2nd jhana, whereas third and fourth jhana become your new normal, where the sukha is really a nice but unnecessary background feature while your main focus is on S&S satipatthana, which can be done in all 4 postures all day. 

 

KN Pe Jhana commentary agrees with that, saying that sati and sampajano are listed in 3rd jhana and not first and second, because piti and sukha can be so dominant, leaving S&S unable to function well.


3. establishing code phrases for 3rd jhana

The phrase that the nobles declare they are "equanimous-observers, rememberful, and dwell in pleasure", is setting up a code phrase for 3rd jhana. That is, suttas not explicitly saying jhana or 3rd jhana, but using that code phrase is strongly implying, if not practically using a synonym for jhana. 

examples:

AN 6.1 no 3rd jhana explicitly mentioned, but monks there are guarding sense doors and using code phrase for 3rd jhana "upekkha + sati + sampajano", making them worthy of offerings.

anuruddha samyutta and MN 152: the 5 abi (noble developed faculties) refer to being upekkha, sati, and sampjano, and those sekhas have 5 bala, 5 indriya, meaning strong samadhi. 

(to be continued...)


Comments

  1. Where in the texts does it say that Lay people are expected to attain the First Jhana?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I cite passages in a linked article within that blog article.

    See article for proof: 🔗Don't give up on jhāna, till you drink from the sutta cup

    https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2020/01/ajahn-brahm-and-visuddhimagga-at.html

    most notably AN 5.176

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex