Skip to main content

Diṭṭhaṃ sutaṃ mutaṃ viññātaṃ pattaṃ pariyesitaṃ anuvicaritaṃ manasā...

Good question asked on dhammawheel,
thinking about what is 'seen, heard, felt, smelled, cognized...'


Diṭṭhaṃ sutaṃ mutaṃ viññātaṃ pattaṃ pariyesitaṃ anuvicaritaṃ manasā...

Post by DooDoot » Tue Mar 31, 2020 11:12 am
Dear Pali forum

Many many suttas (such as AN 8.68 & AN 4.24) include some or all of the following terms: "diṭṭhaṃ sutaṃ mutaṃ viññātaṃ pattaṃ pariyesitaṃ anuvicaritaṃ manasā".

An old thread here discussed these terms in the Upanishads. Note: there appears to be the usual tendency to give chronological primacy to the Upanishads however these terms might probably be found far more numerously in the Pali suttas.

Without having done extensive research, I sense these terms refer to a 'mental or spiritual' cognition (rather than merely a 'physical' cognition) given the word 'manasā' is found above in AN 4.24 & appears to be in the instrumental or, otherwise, ablative case. Thus, it appears the mind (manasā) is performing the seeing, hearing, sensing, etc.

For example, something can be mentally heard & remembered, such as a teaching or conversation; as opposed to merely physically hearing something insignificant with the physical sense organ, such as a bird singing or the wind blowing.

Are there any explanations of these terms in the suttas, Abhidhamma or Commentaries?

Otherwise, please discuss.

Thank you :smile:




Post by Dhammanando » Tue Mar 31, 2020 1:22 pm
DooDoot wrote: ↑
Tue Mar 31, 2020 11:12 am
Are there any explanations of these terms in the suttas, Abhidhamma or Commentaries?
Below are the defns. given by Buddhaghosa in his commentary to the AN's Lokasutta and the MN's Alagaddūpamasutta. As nearly identical ones are are given by Dhammapāla in his commentary to the Itivuttaka and Nettippakaraṇa and by Mahānāma in his commentary to the Paṭisambhidāmagga, it would seem that the meaning of the terms was a quite uncontroversial matter among the Theravadins.
Tattha:
Diṭṭhan ti rūpāyatanaṃ.
Sutan ti saddāyatanaṃ.
Mutan ti patvā gahetabbato gandhāyatanaṃ rasāyatanaṃ phoṭṭhabbāyatanaṃ.
Viññātan ti sukhadukkhādi dhammārammaṇaṃ.
Pattan ti pariyesitvā vā apariyesitvā vā pattaṃ.
Pariyesitan ti pattaṃ vā appattaṃ vā pariyesitaṃ.
Anuvicaritaṃ manasā ti cittena anusañcaritaṃ.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha...
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a...
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex...
Post a Comment
Read more