Skip to main content

Social Media for yogis who prefer noble silence

(article is work in progress)

Why would yogis who prefer solitude and isolation need social media?

What appears at first to be a paradoxical question has a very straightforward motivation. It's a rare person in the world who is willing to devote their life to spiritual practice. They don't need or have any desire for social media to engage in the mundane and inane, spiritually useless discourse.

Just as fire can destroy or be extraordinarily useful, social media for a yogi can actually be a very useful tool, if one has the discipline and spiritual maturity to use it wisely.  Technology allows us to reach rare individuals who are normally unreachable. To access, share great ideas on practice, and get hints and tips without having to traverse the world looking for  awakened yogis dwelling in isolated mountain caves.

Yogis who are experienced and have something of value to share, we should keep a journal of our best ideas. Lessons that came through the school of hard knocks, trial and error. Big mistakes are often more instructive than just confirming a good technique worked as it claimed.  Many things were valuable gems passed on from asking experienced yogis and teachers in person, or reading their biographies. Things, incredibly helpful practical tips and details that the suttas don't talk about. May those who come after us avoid mistakes we've made and get a huge lift from valuable tips and techniques, things we wish we knew when we started this journey.


That said...

Despite the useful properties of social media to access information from nearly impossible to reach yogis, I'm of the opinion that the vast majority of aspiring spiritual yogis, considering pros and cons, would be much better off going off grid, cut off completely from social media and 99% of any media. Most people just don't have the spiritual maturity to handle certain tools, as useful as they can be.

strengths and weaknesses of various platforms:


reddit Buddhist forums:
* + seems to have the largest audience by numbers
* + dropping in cut and paste html preserves hyperlinks, some rich media content
* + upvoting/liking propagates popular topics to top of list

dhammawheel Buddhist forums:
* + very diverse categorization, many niches and specialized topics.
* - very diverse categorization, very cumbersome to cross post
* - poor search engine to find specific topic and even your own old posts.

twitter:
* + limits people to about 200 characters, forces people to choose words carefully with compact meaning.
* + good for broadcasting information in the form of links to content.

facebook:
* + most popular social media platform
* - invasive of privacy, data mining to profit off of your invaded privacy, logging on your photos, videos, etc.
* - poor interface for detailed discussion of length topics

blogger:
* + free service, comes with gmail and google account
* + doesn't clutter and defile your blog pages with advertisements (unless you choose their revenue sharing option)
* + WYSIWYG cut and paste html right into your blog post, preserves html formatting, hyperlinks, rich media,  works great for copy and paste of pali + english sutta formated html tables from lucid24.org.

Comments

  1. Hello Frank, it is my humble request if you could add Petakopadesa to your site lucid24.org, IMO out of all commentaries , this seems to be to in complete coherence with the suttas.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I visit your blog regularly and recommend it to all of those who wanted to enhance their knowledge with ease. The style of writing is excellent and also the content is top-notch. Thanks for that shrewdness you provide the readers! increase moz da

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing blog that understand the value of providing a quality resource for free. afflift

    ReplyDelete
  4. I admire this article for the well-researched content and excellent wording. I got so involved in this material that I couldn’t stop reading. I am impressed with your work and skill. Thank you so much. acheter des vues francaises

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow! Such an amazing and helpful post this is. I really really love it. It's so good and so awesome. I am just amazed. I hope that you continue to do your work like this in the future also Buy TikTok Views

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex