Skip to main content

Fortune favors the virtuous: divine messengers, dreams

How to draw Birds Want freedom | Birds in cage drawing | Oil ...


It's well known (among serious meditators) that devas can communicate with meditators who have strong samādhi, while they are meditating, or even just as they go about in daily life. The communication may be as a voice they hear, thoughts that are communicated without voice, or sometimes even in visible form. Depending on the samadhi and class of deva and samadhi of the meditator. Devas also communicate with people in dreams. Some of the dream states of people (who don't normally meditate) can be quite similar to deep states of samadhi.

Are the things happening in the dream real or just imagination?

It's hard to tell. Especially when the dreams are so vivid they seem as real as the waking state. Here's one case, a student of Ajahn Nyanadhammo, a disciple of Ajahn Chah, where the ghost of an English girl who was killed in the 2004 Indonesia tsunami communicated with a Thai lady (student of Ajahn Nyanadhammo) in her dream.

mp3 audio, go to 24min:40sec, and the story goes about 10 minutes

The whole talk (about 60min) is worth listening to. There are several other stories on there where Devas communicate via dreams. Ajahn Brahm is a charismatic and entertaining story teller.


Whereas my storytelling skills are lacking

I can turn very exciting and dramatic events into drab, clinical and pithy summaries, as I am about to do now.

I've had experiences with most of the types of Deva communication I mentioned above, many times in my life. Some of the stories are quite interesting, maybe if I can muster up the motivation and if and when there is a relevant teaching point, I'll share them someday.

I do want to share this particular incident.
First, because I need to wrap up the article I started recently on sarira (cremation relics).
Second, it's highly relevant to my central point on karmic retribution, devas and guardian angels lending a helping hand.

In a very vivid dream I had, there was a beautiful black bird, inside a beautiful cage, inside a beautiful house. The dream was so vivid you'd think it was more vivid than reality. In some ways it is. In reality, I wear super thick glasses. If thick glasses were directly proportional to intelligence, I'd almost always be the smartest person in the room. In vivid dreams, I have 20/20 vision without glasses. 

The bird in the cage was looking toward the window silently and calmly. As I watched it, I noticed the door to the cage was open! I tried to tell the bird, look over your shoulder, it's open! Why are you just sitting there? Go! Yes your cage is beautiful and comfortable, but freedom outside is even better. You don't have to sit there in your cage looking through a window to the outside. You can just go outside now.

I wasn't sure if the bird knew the door was open, or just attached to the cage. Then I woke up.

The meaning of the dream

I frequently have dreams similar to MN 23 , where the Deva gives a meditator a riddle to solve. After I woke up and thought about my riddle with the black bird, I arrived at a conclusion.

My deva friend was telling me that I'm selling myself short. Unlike most people, who are living like a bird in a cage with the door locked and confined to (self imposed) life imprisonment, I have the great fortune having penetrated Dhamma to some extent that I can make great progress in this very life, and I have access to awakened teachers who can show the way. Yet, even though the door has already been thrown wide open, I'm acting like a dumb ass who's locked up with no way out.

So the message is, get my act together and fully commit to the Dhamma. Fully and whole heartedly.


References

MN 130 Deva-dūta : Divine messengers (5 of them, lesson on karmic retribution in hells)

MN 23 Vammika: Ant hill A deva gives a riddle to a monk: “Sir, what is the ant-hill? What is the fuming by night and flaming by day? Who is the brahmin, and who the sage? What are the sword, the digging, the bar, the bullfrog, the forked path, the box, the tortoise, the axe and block, and the piece of flesh? And what is the dragon?”

✴️SN 1 Devatā Saṃyutta: Deities: 81 suttas, 
✴️SN 2 Deva-putta Saṃyutta: deities'-sons: 30 suttas, 

https://www.buddhismuskunde.uni-hamburg.de/pdf/5-personen/analayo/divine-messengers.pdf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex