Skip to main content

Śarīra (cremated relics) multiplying in Ajahn Mun Thai Forest tradition

4/11/2020: Most of the stories in this article have been removed. The explanation is,  in the forest tradition we should only share these stories among friends in private. If it were to be shared publicly, it may have undesirable and unexpected effects in how the stories are perceived.  

Ajahn Mun (1870-1949) : patriarch of modern Thai Forest Tradition


Portrait of Ajahn Mun.jpg


AF = Ajahn Fuang (1915-1986), B. Thanissaro's teacher

Fuang Jotiko (1915–1986).jpg


A reliquary (also referred to as a shrine or by the French term châsse) is a container for relics. These may be the purported or actual physical remains of saints, such as bones, pieces of clothing, or some object associated with saints or other religious figures.



Ajahn Lee and B. Thanissaro
Photographs | The Autobiography of Phra Ajaan LeeAjaan Thanissaro Bhikkhu - Home | Facebook




6. 2004 Indonesia tsunami, 2 Buddha sarira rescued to Taiwan from Sri Lanka via Deva teleporting


(Report from close friend): I have heard so many accounts of relics multiplying that this phenomena just seems like a normal occurrence.  Growing up in the Pure Land tradition, there are many, many accounts of famous monks' relics (including many Pure Land monks'), famous lay Pure Land and Zen practitioners' relics, and Buddha's relics multiplying.  They come in all colors, sizes, and shapes.

My uncle, a President of a Taiwan Buddhist Association, and a doctor known for tirelessly giving free medical service to monks and nuns,
 told me that just before the massive tsunami of 2004, an abbott of a Sri Lankan monastery that contained two Buddha's relics decided to give one of the two relics to a monastery at Taiwan.  And after the relic was secured in the Taiwan monastery stupa, it mysteriously disappeared.  So the monastery at Taiwan requested for the second relic from the Sri Lankan monastery and gained approval.  Soon after the arrival of the second relic, the Sri Lankan monastery was destroyed by the great tsunami.  And even more interestingly, the original relic that disappeared in the Taiwan stupa reappeared in the stupa.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex