Skip to main content

numerology of EBT sutta numbering

Some sutta numbering patterns  may be coincidental in having a relevant connection to the subject matter of the sutta. But many of them, such as SN 12  seem to be deliberately placed and numbered that way. Ven. Dhammanando notes that Hindu-Arabic numbering system wasn't invented until early CE.

AN 3.60 Saṅgārava: (name of brahman): which of the 3 powers is best, 1. supernormal, 2. 4 types of psychic power, 3. miracle of instruction? connection: there are 360 degrees in a circle and sphere, suggestive of how the psychic power of mind reading is like having eyes that can see all around and everywhere.

AN 3.69 A-kusala-mūla: un-skillful-roots: The Trinity of unholy roots, AKA The Un-holy Trinity: “tīṇi-māni, bhikkhave, a-kusala-mūlāni... lobho ... doso ... moho... connection: 3, 6, 9, are powers of 3. 3 raised to the powers of 1, 2, 3, are 3, 6, 9. The exponential relationship and proliferation of the 3 unholy trinity proliferating is the message. Evil doesn't just grow slowly in a linear way, it explodes like a pandemic virus and kills all in its path.


MN 111: The sutta title is "one after another", and the topic seeing all the factors of jhana and samadhi arising 'one after another'.

SN 12: samyutta nikaya 12, the subject is the 12ps paticca samuppada dependent co-origination

SN 45.8: The eight sutta in SN 45, is the definitive sutta on the noble eightfold path.

11: These go to eleven


Re: numerology of EBT sutta numbering

Post by frank k » Mon Apr 13, 2020 2:56 am
Dhammanando wrote: 
Sun Apr 12, 2020 2:28 pm

frank k wrote: 
Sun Apr 12, 2020 8:28 am
But many of them, such as SN 12 and MN 111, seem to be deliberately placed and numbered that way.
Given that the Hindu-Arabic decimal system wasn't invented until early in the Common Era, it's unlikely that the sutta-reciters would have thought of "a hundred and eleven" as comprising three ones, any more than they would have thought of the number as comprising a C, an X and an I (as it would have been in Rome).
It also occurred to me they wouldn't have been using the modern sutta numbering system either. The old sutta numbering system would have been 3,2,1. 3rd book of MN, 2nd vagga, 1st sutta. 3,2,1, is a descending sequence and perhaps a 'one after another' in that sense?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lucid24.org: What's new?

Link to lucid24.org home page :    4👑☸   Remember, you may have to click the refresh button on your web browser navigation bar at to get updated website. 2026 1-30 Overhauled the DN, MN, SN menu pages - Supreme navigation January 30, 2026 2025 12-16 2025-12 December: Major update on look and feel of Lucid24.org 2024 9-17 Lots of new stuff in the last 2 and a half years.  Too many to list. Main one justifying new blog entry, is redesign of home page. Before, it was designed to please me, super dense with everything in one master control panel. I've redesigned it to be friendly to newbies and everyone really. Clear structure, more use of space.  At someone's request, I added a lucid24.org google site search at top of home page. 2022 4-14 Major update to lucid24.org, easy navigation of suttas, quicklink: the ramifications 4-2 new feature lucid24.org sutta quick link 3-28 A new translation of SN 38.16, and first jhāna is a lot easier than you think 🔗📝notes relat...

AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm and Sujato's "Jhāna" work here?

What these 3 suttas have in common, AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111, is the very interesting feature of explicitly describing doing vipassana, while one is in the jhāna and the first 3 formless attainments. LBT (late buddhist text) apologists, as well as Sujato, Brahm, claim that the suttas describe a jhāna where one enters a disembodied, frozen state, where vipassana is impossible until one emerges from that 'jhāna'.  Since Sujato translated all the suttas, let's take a look at what he translated, and how it supports his interpretation of 'jhāna'.  AN 9.36: Jhānasutta—Bhikkhu Sujato (suttacentral.net) ‘The first absorption is a basis for ending the defilements.’ ‘Paṭhamampāhaṁ,   bhikkhave,   jhānaṁ   nissāya   āsavānaṁ   khayaṁ   vadāmī’ti,   iti   kho   panetaṁ   vuttaṁ. That’s what I said, but why did I say it? Kiñcetaṁ   paṭicca   vuttaṁ? Take a mendicant who, q uite secluded from sensual pleasures, secluded from unskill...

My thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, and the solution

HHDL = His holiness, the Dalai Lama I've collected good references here, including the actual video, and snippets from forums discussions containing valid critcism and explanations of cultural context, and most importantly, what the rules of the actual vinaya that buddhist monks are supposed to follow: 1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue At the time of this writing, HHDL is about 88 years old. He has an exemplary record devoting his life to compassionate service to all living beings,  as a Tibetan Buddhist monk. In this age of 'me too',  everyone with a cell phone with high resolution cameras, and the ability to quickly publicize any indiscretion or sexual crime, we've seen sexual predators in positions of power being exposed and convicted. Leaders of large corporations,  governments, professional sports, doctors, leaders in all religions. Tibetan Buddhism has an especially poor track record with corrupt sexual predators. https://thewal...