Skip to main content

numerology of EBT sutta numbering

Some sutta numbering patterns  may be coincidental in having a relevant connection to the subject matter of the sutta. But many of them, such as SN 12  seem to be deliberately placed and numbered that way. Ven. Dhammanando notes that Hindu-Arabic numbering system wasn't invented until early CE.

AN 3.60 Saṅgārava: (name of brahman): which of the 3 powers is best, 1. supernormal, 2. 4 types of psychic power, 3. miracle of instruction? connection: there are 360 degrees in a circle and sphere, suggestive of how the psychic power of mind reading is like having eyes that can see all around and everywhere.

 AN 3.69 A-kusala-mūla: un-skillful-roots: The Trinity of unholy roots, AKA The Un-holy Trinity: “tīṇi-māni, bhikkhave, a-kusala-mūlāni... lobho ... doso ... moho... connection: 3, 6, 9, are powers of 3. 3 raised to the powers of 1, 2, 3, are 3, 6, 9. The exponential relationship and proliferation of the 3 unholy trinity proliferating is the message. Evil doesn't just grow slowly in a linear way, it explodes like a pandemic virus and kills all in its path.
MN 111: The sutta title is "one after another", and the topic seeing all the factors of jhana and samadhi arising 'one after another'.

SN 12: samyutta nikaya 12, the subject is the 12ps paticca samuppada dependent co-origination

SN 45.8: The eight sutta in SN 45, is the definitive sutta on the noble eightfold path.

11: These go to eleven


Re: numerology of EBT sutta numbering

Post by frank k » Mon Apr 13, 2020 2:56 am
Dhammanando wrote: ↑
Sun Apr 12, 2020 2:28 pm

frank k wrote: ↑
Sun Apr 12, 2020 8:28 am
But many of them, such as SN 12 and MN 111, seem to be deliberately placed and numbered that way.
Given that the Hindu-Arabic decimal system wasn't invented until early in the Common Era, it's unlikely that the sutta-reciters would have thought of "a hundred and eleven" as comprising three ones, any more than they would have thought of the number as comprising a C, an X and an I (as it would have been in Rome).
It also occurred to me they wouldn't have been using the modern sutta numbering system either. The old sutta numbering system would have been 3,2,1. 3rd book of MN, 2nd vagga, 1st sutta. 3,2,1, is a descending sequence and perhaps a 'one after another' in that sense?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha...
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a...
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex...
Post a Comment
Read more