Skip to main content

Child Abuse (inc. sexual) in Buddhist Monasteries in Sri Lanka (Dr. Chandana Namal Rathnayake)

 

60min. video with transcript on youtube


https://discourse.suttacentral.net/t/child-abuse-in-buddhist-monasteries-in-sri-lanka/36513/5

summary by @emptystream


In the video, Dr.
 Rathnayake shares his experiences and research on child abuse within monasteries in Sri Lanka.
 He explains that economic factors and cultural norms, especially in rural areas, lead many families to send their young boys to monasteries, seeing it as a pathway to education and better opportunities.
 (I think this is also relevant for Myanmar and Thailand, but unlike those countries, in Sri Lanka ordination is often permanent, with many monks joining as young as age seven.
) This early initiation can expose young boys to a strict, often harsh monastic environment where boundaries are frequently violated.


Dr. Rathnayake highlights the troubling prevalence of physical and sexual abuse in monasteries.
 His research, including informal surveys with monks and his own lived experience, reveals that over half have experienced some form of abuse, while others have witnessed it.
 This abuse is often facilitated by a rigid hierarchy that limits accountability, with novice monks being considered the “property” of their ordaining teacher, who holds complete control over them.


There is no right to privacy for these novices, with senior monks having access to their sleeping quarters at all times.
 Often the abuse occurs due to this unrestricted access while the novice is asleep.
 The lack of protection and oversight for these young novices allows boundary violations to go unchecked, and many monks grow up carrying unresolved trauma.


Dr. Rathnayake points out that while these abuses are known within the community, they are rarely acknowledged or addressed, creating a pervasive culture of silence.
 He spoke to a famous senior monk who dismissed it casually, referring to it as a long-standing, almost normalized part of monastic life.


The trauma resulting from this abuse has long-term effects on former monks’ ability to connect with Buddhist teachings.
 For many survivors, the abuse leads to a lasting sense of disillusionment, impacting their spiritual lives even after they leave the Sangha.


Although he left monastic life himself, Dr.
 Rathnayake continues to find value in the Dhamma and integrates it into his work as a psychotherapist.
 He wants to bring what is happening to light, in order to change the culture of the Sri Lankan Sangha, and ultimately provide a safe monastic environment for novices in accord with the Buddha’s teachings.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex