Skip to main content

sword of samādhi: Buddha's jhāna vs. Vism. and Ajahn Brahm "jhāna"

This is a sequel to:

sword of samādhi: "It don't mean a thing, if it ain't got that swing!"


At the sight of the blade (Real Buddha's Jhāna), 

Demons of defilement keep their distance.








The demons also respect this sword, but know the wielder has no idea how to swing it. 

That's because all he knows how to do is freeze up and go into a state where the 5 senses of the body shut off. (Ajahn Brahm and Vism. method of corrupt "jhāna")



Buddha's genuine jhāna







Ajahn Brahm and Vism. "Jhāna"








Buddha's Jhāna

The demons of lust, anger, delusion know they have no chance in a direct confrontation with the jhāna warrior. 
Their only hope is to patiently watch and wait for subtle and hidden defilements to exploit and nurture, playing the long game.  






Ajahn Brahm and Vism. counterfeit jhāna

They walk right up to the swordsman, laugh at him, taunt him, give him a wedgie.

Then they take his blade of samatha away, and use it against him!

The demon kings of delusion use the power of stillness (Ajahn Brahm translation of 'samādhi') to persuade the clueless meditator 
to cling tenaciously to wrong views,
ignore all evidence counter to their deeply held dogma,
come up with ridiculous brahm'splanations to justify their view,
misleading and deceiving themselves and gullible companions.

Right jhāna 

has sati, pañña, sammā samādhi conjoined and operating in unison.
Right view, right undistractible lucidity, 
right remembering and applying of Dhamma 
working simultaneously in harmony (SN 47.4, MN 117, many others).
While doing jhāna in all postures and activities, 
right view would recognize mistakes, wrong views, 
and abandon them in a timely manner.

Wrong jhāna 

uses the strength of samatha to stubbornly cling to wrong views, 
and by divesting itself of right view and sati, 
which can not be operating at the same time
as "the stillness" of wrong jhāna.
The samatha works against the wrong jhāna meditator, 
as right view, right thinking (vitakka) are never allowed to do their job 
in evaluating one's own mind, motivations, biases, and so forth.

The (real) jhāna meditator, doesn't even need to unsheathe their blade

Demons don't want any part that

Real Jhāna warriors are undistractible, lucidly discerning (Buddha's definition of 'samādhi'),
always remembering and applying the appropriate Dharma every moment,
whatever posture or activity they're doing, 
whether eyes open or closed,
jhāna blade sheathed or dancing, hidden or overt,
whether in a serene, still posture, or dynamic activity,
real jhāna is ready on a moment's notice to take care of business.


Conclusion

sword of samādhi: "It don't mean a thing, if it ain't got that swing!"



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex
Post a Comment
Read more