Skip to main content

sword of samādhi: "It don't mean a thing, if it ain't got that swing!" (comparing various Buddhist meditation systems)

 The dry insight "sword" of samādhi 



That sword is not looking too sharp. 
While the dry insight warrior is armored,
guarding the sense doors diligently mentally noting all the defilements every moment,
that spoon sword is not going to do any damage against the really big monsters and demons.
You could beat very minor demons with the spoon and stun them for a short time, 
and maybe scoop the poop of the bigger monsters,
but you're never going to deal a death blow to the defilements with that thing.



Another dry insight meditator here. 
Weapon of choice is a bamboo spatula instead of shiny serving spoon.
Quiver of arrows have no sharp tips.
Spear has no sharp tip.
You could maybe hurt some mosquitoes with that spatula?

Too much vipassana, not enough samatha,
resulting in toothless, unsharpened, unlethal weapons.
Without enough samatha, insights will be superficial.

 Visuddhi-magga and Ajahn Brahm sword of samādhi:


It's shiny and sharp!

The VRJ and BRJ meditator spends most of the day sitting down, 
sharpening their swords,
polishing and stroking their blades for hours on end,
becoming masters of their domain in samatha.

The problem is, 
 "It don't mean a thing, if it ain't got that swing!"
You can have the sharpest blade, shiniest (nimitta) in the world,
but if you never actually practice using the sword to fight against defilements,
it's not worth much.
Too much time mastering samatha,
not enough time swinging the sword (vipassana/insight).
Swing it, brother swing.

 

Correct EBT translation and interpretation of the Buddha's Jhāna

all factors of noble eightfold path and seven awakening factors developed in unison, 
holistically, organically, 
according the Buddha's words.
Samatha and Vipassana yoked evenly.
Now this is a sword of samādhi.





Gāthā

It don't mean a thing,
if it ain't got that swing.
Ekaggatā,
Ekaggatā,
Ekodibhāva.



Sequel

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex
Post a Comment
Read more