Skip to main content

SN 12.63 son's flesh (illustrated)

 One of my favorite suttas. 










SN 12.63 Putta-maṃsa: A Child’s Flesh

(2022 SP-FLUENT translation by frankk‍ derived from B. Sujato‍ 2018/12)
            SN 12.63.1 – kabaḷī-kāro āhāro: solid food ↔ parents eat child jerky to cross desert
                SN 12.63.1.7 – when food understood → 5kg pleasure cords understood → nonreturner
            SN 12.63.2 – phass-āhāro: contact ↔ everywhere flayed cow goes bugs devour her
                SN 12.63.2.7 – when contact understood → 3 sensations (vedana) understood → arahant
            SN 12.63.3 – mano-sañ-cetan-āhāro: mental-intention ↔ man dragged to pit of fire against will
                SN 12.63.3.7 – when intention understood → 3 cravings (taṇhā) understood → arahant
            SN 12.63.4 – Viññāṇ-āhāro: consciousness ↔ bandit shot with 300 arrows a day
                SN 12.63.4.7 – when consciousness understood → name & form understood → arahant




63. Puttamaṃsasutta
63. A Child’s Flesh
Sāvatthiyaṁ …
At Sāvatthī.
“cattārome, bhikkhave, āhārā
“monks, there are these four fuels.
bhūtānaṁ vā sattānaṁ ṭhitiyā sambhavesīnaṁ vā anuggahāya.
They maintain sentient beings that have been born and help those that are about to be born.
Katame cattāro?
Which four?
Kabaḷīkāro āhāro oḷāriko vā sukhumo vā,
Solid food, whether coarse or fine;
phasso dutiyo,
contact is the second,
manosañcetanā tatiyā,
mental intention the third,
viññāṇaṁ catutthaṁ.
and consciousness the fourth.
Ime kho, bhikkhave, cattāro āhārā bhūtānaṁ vā sattānaṁ ṭhitiyā sambhavesīnaṁ vā anuggahāya.
These are the four fuels that maintain sentient beings that have been born and help those that are about to be born.

12.63.1 – kabaḷī-kāro āhāro: solid food ↔ parents eat child jerky to cross desert


Kathañca, bhikkhave, kabaḷīkāro āhāro daṭṭhabbo?
And how should you regard solid food?
Seyyathāpi, bhikkhave, dve jāyampatikā parittaṁ sambalaṁ ādāya kantāramaggaṁ paṭipajjeyyuṁ.
Suppose a couple who were husband and wife set out to cross a desert, taking limited supplies.
Tesamassa ekaputtako piyo manāpo.
They had an only child, dear and beloved.
Atha kho tesaṁ, bhikkhave, dvinnaṁ jāyampatikānaṁ kantāragatānaṁ yā parittā sambalamattā, sā parikkhayaṁ pariyādānaṁ gaccheyya.
As the couple were crossing the desert their limited quantity of supplies would run out,
Siyā ca nesaṁ kantārāvaseso anatiṇṇo.
and they’d still have the rest of the desert to cross.
Atha kho tesaṁ, bhikkhave, dvinnaṁ jāyampatikānaṁ evamassa:
Then it would occur to that couple:
‘amhākaṁ kho yā parittā sambalamattā sā parikkhīṇā pariyādiṇṇā.
‘Our limited quantity of supplies has run out, and we still have the rest of the desert to cross.
Atthi cāyaṁ kantārāvaseso anittiṇṇo.
Why don’t we kill our only child, so dear and beloved, and prepare dried and spiced meat?
Yannūna mayaṁ imaṁ ekaputtakaṁ piyaṁ manāpaṁ vadhitvā vallūrañca soṇḍikañca karitvā puttamaṁsāni khādantā evaṁ taṁ kantārāvasesaṁ nitthareyyāma,
Then we can make it across the desert by eating our child’s flesh.
mā sabbeva tayo vinassimhā’ti.
Let not all three perish.’
Atha kho te, bhikkhave, dve jāyampatikā taṁ ekaputtakaṁ piyaṁ manāpaṁ vadhitvā vallūrañca soṇḍikañca karitvā
Then that couple would kill their only child, so dear and beloved, and prepare dried and spiced meat.
puttamaṁsāni khādantā evaṁ taṁ kantārāvasesaṁ nitthareyyuṁ.
They’d make it across the desert by eating their child’s flesh.
Te puttamaṁsāni ceva khādeyyuṁ, ure ca paṭipiseyyuṁ:
And as they’d eat their child’s flesh, they’d beat their breasts and cry:
‘kahaṁ, ekaputtaka, kahaṁ,
‘Where are you, our only child?
ekaputtakā’ti.
Where are you, our only child?’
Taṁ kiṁ maññatha, bhikkhave,
What do you think, monks?
api nu te davāya vā āhāraṁ āhāreyyuṁ, madāya vā āhāraṁ āhāreyyuṁ, maṇḍanāya vā āhāraṁ āhāreyyuṁ, vibhūsanāya vā āhāraṁ āhāreyyun”ti?
Would they eat that food for fun, indulgence, adornment, or decoration?”
“No hetaṁ, bhante”.
“No, sir.”
“Nanu te, bhikkhave, yāvadeva kantārassa nittharaṇatthāya āhāraṁ āhāreyyun”ti?
“Wouldn’t they eat that food just so they could make it across the desert?”
“Evaṁ, bhante”.
“Yes, sir.”
12.63.1.7 – when food understood → 5kg pleasure cords understood → nonreturner


“‘Evameva khvāhaṁ, bhikkhave, kabaḷīkāro āhāro daṭṭhabbo’ti vadāmi.
“I say that this is how you should regard solid food.
Kabaḷīkāre, bhikkhave, āhāre pariññāte
When solid food is completely understood,
pañca kāmaguṇiko rāgo pariññāto hoti.
desire for the five kinds of sensual stimulation is completely understood.
Pañca kāmaguṇike rāge pariññāte
When desire for the five kinds of sensual stimulation is completely understood,
natthi taṁ saṁyojanaṁ yena saṁyojanena saṁyutto ariyasāvako puna imaṁ lokaṁ āgaccheyya.
a noble-one's-disciple is bound by no fetter that might return them again to this world.

12.63.2 – phass-āhāro: contact ↔ everywhere flayed cow goes bugs devour her


Kathañca, bhikkhave, phassāhāro daṭṭhabbo?
And how should you regard contact as fuel?
Seyyathāpi, bhikkhave, gāvī niccammā kuṭṭañce nissāya tiṭṭheyya.
Suppose there was a flayed cow.
Ye kuṭṭanissitā pāṇā te naṁ khādeyyuṁ.
If she stands by a wall, the creatures on the wall bite her.
Rukkhañce nissāya tiṭṭheyya, ye rukkhanissitā pāṇā te naṁ khādeyyuṁ.
If she stands under a tree, the creatures in the tree bite her.
Udakañce nissāya tiṭṭheyya, ye udakanissitā pāṇā te naṁ khādeyyuṁ.
If she stands in some water, the creatures in the water bite her.
Ākāsañce nissāya tiṭṭheyya, ye ākāsanissitā pāṇā te naṁ khādeyyuṁ.
If she stands in the open, the creatures in the open bite her.
Yaṁ yadeva hi sā, bhikkhave, gāvī niccammā nissāya tiṭṭheyya, ye tannissitā pāṇā te naṁ khādeyyuṁ.
Wherever that flayed cow stands, the creatures there would bite her.
12.63.2.7 – when contact understood → 3 sensations (vedana) understood → arahant


Evameva khvāhaṁ, bhikkhave, ‘phassāhāro daṭṭhabbo’ti vadāmi.
I say that this is how you should regard contact as fuel.
Phasse, bhikkhave, āhāre pariññāte
When contact as fuel is completely understood,
tisso vedanā pariññātā honti.
the three feelings are completely understood.
Tīsu vedanāsu pariññātāsu
When the three feelings are completely understood,
ariyasāvakassa natthi kiñci uttarikaraṇīyanti vadāmi.
a noble-one's-disciple has nothing further to do, I say.

12.63.3 – mano-sañ-cetan-āhāro: mental-intention ↔ man dragged to pit of fire against will


Kathañca, bhikkhave, manosañcetanāhāro daṭṭhabbo?
And how should you regard mental intention as fuel?
Seyyathāpi, bhikkhave, aṅgārakāsu sādhikaporisā puṇṇā aṅgārānaṁ vītaccikānaṁ vītadhūmānaṁ.
Suppose there was a pit of glowing coals deeper than a man’s height, filled with glowing coals that neither flamed nor smoked.
Atha puriso āgaccheyya jīvitukāmo amaritukāmo sukhakāmo dukkhappaṭikūlo.
Then a person would come along who wants to live and doesn’t want to die, who wants to be happy and recoils from pain.
Tamenaṁ dve balavanto purisā nānābāhāsu gahetvā taṁ aṅgārakāsuṁ upakaḍḍheyyuṁ.
Then two strong men would grab them by the arms and drag them towards the pit of glowing coals.
Atha kho, bhikkhave, tassa purisassa ārakāvassa cetanā ārakā patthanā ārakā paṇidhi.
Then that person’s intention, aim, and wish would be to get far away.
Taṁ kissa hetu?
Why is that?
Evañhi, bhikkhave, tassa purisassa hoti:
Because that person would think:
‘imañcāhaṁ aṅgārakāsuṁ papatissāmi, tatonidānaṁ maraṇaṁ vā nigacchāmi maraṇamattaṁ vā dukkhan’ti.
‘If I fall in that pit of glowing coals, that will result in my death or deadly pain.’
Evameva khvāhaṁ, bhikkhave, ‘manosañcetanāhāro daṭṭhabbo’ti vadāmi.
I say that this is how you should regard mental intention as fuel.
12.63.3.7 – when intention understood → 3 cravings (taṇhā) understood → arahant


Manosañcetanāya, bhikkhave, āhāre pariññāte
When mental intention as fuel is completely understood,
tisso taṇhā pariññātā honti.
the three cravings are completely understood.
Tīsu taṇhāsu pariññātāsu
When the three cravings are completely understood,
ariyasāvakassa natthi kiñci uttarikaraṇīyanti vadāmi.
a noble-one's-disciple has nothing further to do, I say.

12.63.4 – Viññāṇ-āhāro: consciousness ↔ bandit shot with 300 arrows a day


Kathañca, bhikkhave, viññāṇāhāro daṭṭhabbo?
And how should you regard consciousness as fuel?
Seyyathāpi, bhikkhave, coraṁ āgucāriṁ gahetvā rañño dasseyyuṁ:
Suppose they were to arrest a bandit, a criminal and present him to the king, saying:
‘ayaṁ te, deva, coro āgucārī,
‘Your Majesty, this is a bandit, a criminal.
imassa yaṁ icchasi taṁ daṇḍaṁ paṇehī’ti.
Punish him as you will.’
Tamenaṁ rājā evaṁ vadeyya:
The king would say:
‘gacchatha, bho, imaṁ purisaṁ pubbaṇhasamayaṁ sattisatena hanathā’ti.
‘Go, my men, and strike this man in the morning with a hundred spears!’
Tamenaṁ pubbaṇhasamayaṁ sattisatena haneyyuṁ.
The king’s men did as they were told.
Atha rājā majjhanhikasamayaṁ evaṁ vadeyya:
Then at midday the king would say:
‘ambho, kathaṁ so puriso’ti?
‘My men, how is that man?’
‘Tatheva, deva, jīvatī’ti.
‘He’s still alive, Your Majesty.’
Tamenaṁ rājā evaṁ vadeyya:
The king would say:
‘gacchatha, bho, taṁ purisaṁ majjhanhikasamayaṁ sattisatena hanathā’ti.
‘Go, my men, and strike this man in the middle of the day with a hundred spears!’
Tamenaṁ majjhanhikasamayaṁ sattisatena haneyyuṁ.
The king’s men did as they were told.
Atha rājā sāyanhasamayaṁ evaṁ vadeyya:
Then late in the afternoon the king would say:
‘ambho, kathaṁ so puriso’ti?
‘My men, how is that man?’
‘Tatheva, deva, jīvatī’ti.
‘He’s still alive, Your Majesty.’
Tamenaṁ rājā evaṁ vadeyya:
The king would say:
‘gacchatha, bho, taṁ purisaṁ sāyanhasamayaṁ sattisatena hanathā’ti.
‘Go, my men, and strike this man in the late afternoon with a hundred spears!’
Tamenaṁ sāyanhasamayaṁ sattisatena haneyyuṁ.
The king’s men did as they were told.
Taṁ kiṁ maññatha, bhikkhave,
What do you think, monks?
api nu so puriso divasaṁ tīhi sattisatehi haññamāno tatonidānaṁ dukkhaṁ domanassaṁ paṭisaṁvediyethā”ti?
Would that man experience pain and distress from being struck with three hundred spears a day?”
“Ekissāpi, bhante, sattiyā haññamāno tatonidānaṁ dukkhaṁ domanassaṁ paṭisaṁvediyetha;
“Sir, that man would experience pain and distress from being struck with one spear,
ko pana vādo tīhi sattisatehi haññamāno”ti.
let alone three hundred spears!”
12.63.4.7 – when consciousness understood → name & form understood → arahant


“Evameva khvāhaṁ, bhikkhave, viññāṇāhāro daṭṭhabboti vadāmi.
“I say that this is how you should regard consciousness as fuel.
Viññāṇe, bhikkhave, āhāre pariññāte
When consciousness as fuel is completely understood,
nāmarūpaṁ pariññātaṁ hoti,
name and form is completely understood.
nāmarūpe pariññāte
When name and form are completely understood,
ariyasāvakassa natthi kiñci uttarikaraṇīyanti vadāmī”ti.
a noble-one's-disciple has nothing further to do, I say.”

(end of sutta⏹️)


Forum discussion


https://www.reddit.com/r/EarlyBuddhismMeditati/comments/1fjrngb/chanting_tip_some_suttas_you_memorize_just_visual/

Chanting tip: some suttas you memorize just visual images and key points

One of my favorite suttas.:

SN 12.63 son's flesh (illustrated)

I recite it everyday, but not in pali, and not word for word.

It just takes about 20 seconds,

I visualize the 4 scenes as in the illustrated sutta above,

and I recite the concise summary of the sutta, and reflect on the key points (what is needed to be done to become arahant, and am I getting closer?)

I do this sutta, in this way, everyday right before eating lunch. And also reflect more deeply on it WHILE eating lunch. No reason to restrict this sutta to 20 seconds! I just set a minimum to convince myself that it's justified to review it everyday. This is such a great sutta it's worth 20 seconds everyday to review it. If you don't you find your mind will tend to drift back to food being subha (attractive, beautiful, alluring). 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex