Skip to main content

Cinderella and the Revenge of the EBT

 



A long time ago, about 500 years after the Buddha entered nirvana without remainder...

The empire overthrew the EBT republic and redefined Jhāna. 

They mostly reigned unchallenged for over a thousand years.



Circa 1983 CE, a false EBT arose...

claiming to be descendants of the original EBT republic.
But really they were just rebranding the empire's redefinition of Jhāna with a corrupt dictionary,
so that the EBT suttas could seemingly support the Empire's redefined "Jhāna".





Part 1 of stepsister Jhāna

Part 2 of stepsister "jhāna


Group photo from Sujato's Visuddhimagga seminar

According to Sujato, other than the wisdom chapters, not much difference between Vimuttimagga and Visuddhimagga


As of 2024 CE, a small contingent of genuine EBT rebels are fighting back 









How does this epic saga end?

tune in and find out.


It takes an eco system of charismatic leaders,

powerful and influential enablers, 

and hordes of influential trusting followers to keep the Empire running smoothly.

They all need to work together.









Wrong views do not get created and supported in a vacuum.

All it takes for wrong views to thrive and dominate, 

is for good people of right view to say and do nothing.



However, don't count out the (genuine) EBT Rebel resistance


 kamma-s-saka doesn't always work out as fast as you like, 

and it doesn't always serve justice. 


But sometimes, it can. Let's hope it does.















 "Your days of promulgating a heretical system of jhāna are over, Punk!"





Darth in happier times... 

part 1

part 2





Comments

  1. love it 😂

    there's also a new false EBT that arose (existential "dhamma", hillside hermitage), poisoning the minds of those unfortunate enough to fall into their trap

    truly there is more counterfeit money now than real money

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're more than welcome to post anything you think need the public needs to know on the reddit forums I moderate. We need to establish a culture where authority figures are held accountable, defend and justify questionable teachings.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex