Skip to main content

AN 3.67 Kathāvatthu sutta, what about Bhikkhus evading credible challenges to their erroneous views?


quote from AN 3.67

 

Re: How to Discuss the Dhamma

Post by frank k » 

Bhikkhu Pesala wrote: ↑Mon Sep 02, 2024 4:53 pm... (from a sutta) If, monks, when asked a question he does not change the subject, thus keeping the discussion on-topic, if he does not become angry or sullen; then he is fit to discuss with.”
...
Here is a thread from 2016.
Sujato posted 2nd message on this thread, a link to his essay with his wrong interpretation of vitakka.
https://discourse.suttacentral.net/t/wh ... ra/3148/28

The message #28 that I link to above, is from Sept. 2023,
where he is directly engaged in questioning about his vitakka interpretation and translation,
and evades the subject.


So seven years at least, on public record where an ordained Bhikkhu is not exactly changing the subject,
but definitely not "keeping the discussion on topic" in the spirit of the meaning.

Normally, I don't care if someone, even a monastic, has wrong views on anything,
that's just the way of the world.

But someone who is very popular, very influential, his sutta translations are probably quoted more than anyone else's nowadays,
has a responsibility to answer any credible challenges to their translation on important key terms.

What do you think, Ven. Pesala?



Re: How to Discuss the Dhamma

Post by frank k » 

Bhikkhu Pesala wrote: ↑Sat Sep 14, 2024 12:54 amThe PTS Dictionary gives several meanings of Vitakka, including “thinking,” but in the context of the factors of jhāna I use the translation “Initial Application.” It is the mental factor that applies the mind to an object, paying attention to it, in order to understand its true nature....
Thanks Ven., I should have been more specific in my question.
I wasn't asking you what your understanding of vitakka's definition was.
I was only interested in the context of this thread,
what are proper protocol in discussing Dhamma,
especially by influential Buddhist teachers like Ajahn Sujato, Brahm, Analayo, who have widespread teachings on jhāna through their translation, interpretation, etc.

The thread link I shared,
Sujato had been evading the question of why he insists on his interpretation when people show many suttas and canonical texts that contradict it.
Over a 7 year period of time he's been evading these questions.

AN 3.67 doesn't really address that, neither does the vinaya AFAIK.
If experts showing detailed evidence that Sujato's interpretation of vitakka is incoherent,
isn't he obligated by some moral code, if not vinaya,
to at least respond and give some explanation of why he doesn't agree with credible challenges?
This is a dispute of major aspects of Dhamma that have huge implications on how people practice Dhamma,
not some trivial issue where busy monks and busy people could be expected to avoid answering.

Again, It's not about whether Sujato's interpretation of vitakka is correct, 
it's about one's honor, integrity, moral code, to answer credible challenges from experts with detailed evidence from the suttas
challenging one's interpretation.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lucid24.org: What's new?

Link to lucid24.org home page :    4👑☸   Remember, you may have to click the refresh button on your web browser navigation bar at to get updated website. 2024 9-17 Lots of new stuff in the last 2 and a half years.  Too many to list. Main one justifying new blog entry, is redesign of home page. Before, it was designed to please me, super dense with everything in one master control panel. I've redesigned it to be friendly to newbies and everyone really. Clear structure, more use of space.  At someone's request, I added a lucid24.org google site search at top of home page. 2022 4-14 Major update to lucid24.org, easy navigation of suttas, quicklink: the ramifications 4-2 new feature lucid24.org sutta quick link 3-28 A new translation of SN 38.16, and first jhāna is a lot easier than you think 🔗📝notes related to Jhāna force and J.A.S.I. effect AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm and Sujato's "Jhāna" work here? 3-13 Added to EBPedia J.A.S.I. ('Jazzy...
3 comments
Read more

AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111: How does Ajahn Brahm and Sujato's "Jhāna" work here?

What these 3 suttas have in common, AN 9.36, MN 64, MN 111, is the very interesting feature of explicitly describing doing vipassana, while one is in the jhāna and the first 3 formless attainments. LBT (late buddhist text) apologists, as well as Sujato, Brahm, claim that the suttas describe a jhāna where one enters a disembodied, frozen state, where vipassana is impossible until one emerges from that 'jhāna'.  Since Sujato translated all the suttas, let's take a look at what he translated, and how it supports his interpretation of 'jhāna'.  AN 9.36: Jhānasutta—Bhikkhu Sujato (suttacentral.net) ‘The first absorption is a basis for ending the defilements.’ ‘Paṭhamampāhaṁ,   bhikkhave,   jhānaṁ   nissāya   āsavānaṁ   khayaṁ   vadāmī’ti,   iti   kho   panetaṁ   vuttaṁ. That’s what I said, but why did I say it? Kiñcetaṁ   paṭicca   vuttaṁ? Take a mendicant who, q uite secluded from sensual pleasures, secluded from unskill...
Post a Comment
Read more

Pāḷi and Sanskrit definition of Viveka

  'Viveka', Sanskrit dictionary Primary meaning is ‘discrimination’. Other meanings:  (1) true knowledge,  (2) discretion,  (3) right judgement,  (4) the faculty of distinguishing and classifying things according to their real properties’. Wikipedia (sanskrit dictionary entry 'viveka') Viveka (Sanskrit: विवेक, romanized: viveka) is a Sanskrit and Pali term translated into English as discernment or discrimination.[1] According to Rao and Paranjpe, viveka can be explained more fully as: Sense of discrimination; wisdom; discrimination between the real and the unreal, between the self and the non-self, between the permanent and the impermanent; discriminative inquiry; right intuitive discrimination; ever present discrimination between the transient and the permanent.[2]: 348  The Vivekachudamani is an eighth-century Sanskrit poem in dialogue form that addresses the development of viveka. Within the Vedanta tradition, there is also a concept of vichara which is one t...
Post a Comment
Read more