Skip to main content

KN Snp 5.7 what exactly does "mindfulness" do in Sujato's 4 jhānas and 7 perception attainments?

Sujato wrote:


https://discourse.suttacentral.net/t/snp-5-7-the-questions-of-upasiva/27299
...

The Buddha urges him to contemplate “nothingness”, and, being mindful, to cross the flood relying on the meditation “there is nothing”. This makes explicit the reference to the dimension of nothingness, which has been hinted at previously. Mindfulness is of course a crucial ingredient of all states of samādhi.
...


Frankk response

Sati ("mindfulness") and sampajāno (lucid discerning, right view, wisdom),
are in fact so crucial the Buddha has those terms embedded explicitly in 3rd and 4th jhāna standard formula,
as well as all 7 attainments (MN 111).

So what exactly is sati doing in Sujato's understanding of 4 jhānas?
If the meditator is suppose to be in a disembodied frozen stupor,
what exactly are they "mindful" of?
And how is that a "crucial ingredient... to cross the flood [and realize enlightenment]" that Sujato claims above?

And what exactly is sampajāno doing in the meantime?
Sujato translates that term as "situational awareness".
Is the meditator aware of the situation of being in a frozen disembodied stupor?
According to Vism. and Ajahn Brahm, it's not possible to do that until after you emerge from your (corrupt redefined) jhāna.

If that's the case, then why does the Buddha embed the terms sati and sampajāno explicitly in the 3rd and 4th jhāna, and all 7 perception attainments, when you can't even do those things while in (their) jhāna?

Do they realize that their interpretation of jhāna, samādhi, sati make no sense?
Are they aware of that situation?





The Buddha's (real) Jhāna Samādhi

Undistractible (samādhi), lucid, imperturbable, patiently endures (khama) whatever assaults the 5 senses, 
always remember and applies the appropriate Dharma for that moment (sati),
lucidly discerns (sampajāno) their origin, cessation, and the path to the end of all suffering;
while in the 4 jhānas and 7 perception attainments.
Real jhāna is not a disembodied frozen stupor you have to emerge from.










Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex