Skip to main content

AN 5.113, AN 5.139 war elephant and monk experiences 5 sensory faculties (illustrated), but not according to Ajahn Brahm!


AN 5.113 Sammā-samādhi: Right undistractible-lucidity

(2023 SP-FLUENT translation by frankk‍ )
(see 🌄🐘🛡️🏹‍ 
♦ 113. “pañca-'hi, bhikkhave, dhammehi samannāgato
“Possessing five of these dharmas,
bhikkhu a-bhabbo sammā-samādhiṃ
a monk is not capable of righteous-undistractable-lucidity,
upasampajja viharituṃ.
Is not capable of attaining and living in that state.
katamehi pañcahi?
Which five?
idha, bhikkhave, bhikkhu
Here, monks, a monk
1. ak-khamo hoti rūpānaṃ,
1. can't-patiently-endure forms,
2. ak-khamo saddānaṃ,
2. can't-patiently-endure sounds,
3. ak-khamo gandhānaṃ,
3. can't-patiently-endure odors,
4. ak-khamo rasānaṃ,
4. can't-patiently-endure tastes,
5. ak-khamo phoṭṭhabbānaṃ.
5. can't-patiently-endure tactile-objects.
imehi kho, bhikkhave, pañcahi dhammehi samannāgato
“Possessing five of these dharmas,
bhikkhu a-bhabbo sammā-samādhiṃ
a monk is not capable of righteous-undistractable-lucidity,
upasampajja viharituṃ.
Is not capable of attaining and living in that state.




There are several suttas entitled 'samādhi' in the canon. But only one sutta titled 'sammā-samādhi'. Notice the 5 sense faculties are active, engaged, and resilient to all the kinds of sensation that are experienced in the physical body.

But wait, according to Ajahn Brahm, in 'right stillness' (his corrupt understanding of samādhi and jhāna), the 5 senses are shut off. Who should we believe, Ajahn Brahm, or the Buddha?

In AN 5.139 (and MN 125), the Buddha expands on that sammā-samādhi idea, with a war elephant. Let's use some illustrations to demonstrate the difference between Ajahn Brahm, Ajahn Sujato's "jhāna", vs. the Buddha's Jhāna.

AN 5.139 Ak-khama: Cannot Endure

(2023 SP-FLUENT translation by frankk‍ derived from B. Sujato‍ )
    AN 5.139 - AN 5.139 Akkhama: Cannot Endure
        AN 5.139.1 - (five ways elephant not resilient)
            AN 5.139.1.1 - (form)
            AN 5.139.1.2 - (sound)
            AN 5.139.1.3 - (smell)
            AN 5.139.1.4 - (taste)
            AN 5.139.1.5 - (touch)
        AN 5.139.2 - (five ways monk not resilient)
            AN 5.139.2.1 - (form)
            AN 5.139.2.2 - (sound)
            AN 5.139.2.3 - (smell)
            AN 5.139.2.4 - (taste)
            AN 5.139.2.5 - (touch)






The Buddha's (real) Jhāna

They may appear "still" at times, but 5 senses are sharp, active, alert, ready to deal with the demons of defilements and destroy them in battle.


Ajahn Brahm, Sujato, Vism. counterfeit jhāna

When the 5 sense faculties come into contact with 5 unpleasant types of sensations via the eyes, ears, nose etc., the monk and the war elephant get scared, freeze up, and try to play dead, being really "still" (Brahm and Sujato "translation" of samādhi).


Their attitude and means to conquer unpleasant sensations, is to be very "still" and surrender.



The Buddha's (real) Jhāna

When the war elephant is assaulted by deadly weapons, terrifying sounds of enemy attack, war drums, they patiently endure (khama, khanti), they're imperturbable (MN 125), and they fight back. They don't freeze up like scared little cry babies.


Similarly, the monk with real Buddha's jhāna, when assaulted by unpleasant sights, sounds, smells, etc., they patiently endure it, they remain imperturbable, their mind is undistractible and lucid, seeing into the causes of suffering, and making their way to end it. 

Ajahn Brahm, Sujato, Vism. counterfeit jhāna

 The meditators practicing this kind of counterfeit jhāna, when assaulted by unpleasant and difficult sensations, "enter stillness", and go into a frozen disembodied stupor.  



Do they learn anything about the cause, origin of suffering by escaping into "stillness"?


Perhaps they hope that when they emerge from their disembodied frozen stupor some time later, that their problems magically disappear?


The Buddha's (real) Jhāna

Even hurt, injured, under threat of imminent death, the true monk and war elephant fight the enemy (mental defilements) with everything they got.




Ajahn Brahm, Sujato, Vism. counterfeit jhāna

They don't even realize they're injured and confused.
Read AN 5.113, AN 5.139, MN 125 carefully.
Either the Buddha is really terrible at making analogies and similes (war elephant : monk),
or Ajahn Brahm and Vism. have a corrupt redefinition of jhāna samādhi.




The Buddha's (real) Jhāna Samādhi

Undistractible (samādhi), lucid, imperturbable, patiently endures (khama) whatever assaults the 5 senses, 
always remember and applies the appropriate Dharma for that moment (sati),
lucidly discerns (sampajāno) their origin, cessation, and the path to the end of all suffering.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex