Skip to main content

AN 7.67 fortress sutta: another case where Dhamma is Buddha Dharma, not "mental qualities"

You can compare his translation to mine in this section, but as further strong convincing proof he needs to leave Dhamma untranslated (rather than "mental qualities" or "qualities" which he does most of the time), this passage in AN 7.67 is a prime example. The 7 true Dharmas this sutta is talking about, is basically a slightly modified form of STED 5ind (indriya/faculties), where hiri and ottappa get added as 6th and 7th factors. 

Now the 5ind is on the same royal noble hierarchy as the 4 noble truths, 8aam noble eightfold path, 5 powers, 5 faculties. You don't refer to 5ind as "5 qualities", just as you don't refer to The Buddha as "that guy", and the four noble truths as "4 things". It's not "That guy who taught 4 things", it's the perfectly awakened Buddha who taught a Dharma that we have to safeguard and memorize with word for word fidelity. 

B. Thanissaro, clearly aware of this, translates sad-dhamma in this passage as "true-qualities [sa-Dhamma]". In other words, he is uncomfortable with referring to dhamma as just "qualities", so he adds "Dhamma" in parenthesis. 



evamevaį¹ƒ kho, bhikkhave,
“In the same way, monks,
yato ariyasāvako
when a disciple of the noble ones
sattahi sa-d-dhammehi samannāgato hoti,
is endowed with seven true-☸Dharmas
{…}
{then he easily obtains}

(STED 4j pleasurable-abiding)

(differs with STED: catunnaƱca jhānānaį¹ƒ)
catunnaį¹ƒ jhānānaį¹ƒ
four Jhānas {which are}
ābhi-cetasikānaį¹ƒ
heightened-mental-states,
diį¹­į¹­ha-dhamma--
(a) visible-Dharma-[truth] [here & now],
-sukha-vihārānaį¹ƒ
(a) pleasurable-dwelling,
ni-kāma-lābhī hoti
{obtainable} at-will {****},
a-kiccha-lābhī
{obtainable} without-difficulty,
a-kasira-lābhī
{obtainable} without-trouble,
ayaį¹ƒ vuccati, bhikkhave,
(he is) said to be
ariya-sāvako
a disciple of the noble ones
a-karaį¹‡Ä«yo mārassa
(who can’t be) un-done (by) Māra,
a-karaį¹‡Ä«yo pāpimato.
(can’t be) un-done (by the) Evil One.
katamehi sattahi saddhammehi samannāgato hoti?
“Now, with which seven true-☸Dharmas is he endowed?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex
Post a Comment
Read more