Skip to main content

STED 4bv☮️ , brahma-viharas, and symbols for them 1.๐Ÿค๐Ÿค— 2.๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜Š 3.๐Ÿ˜Š 4.๐Ÿ›†๐Ÿ‘️



(pali & english text, and audio here)

https://audtip.blogspot.com/2019/06/4bv-4-brahma-vihara-pali-and-english.html


An explanation of the 4bv emoticons 



4bv☮️ ๐Ÿ”ฌdetails

4bv☮️: brahma-vihฤra: 4 divine-dwellings.
1. Mettฤ๐Ÿค๐Ÿค—: friendly-kindness.
2. Karuแน‡ฤ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜Š: Compassion.
3. Muditฤ๐Ÿ˜Š: Altruistic-mirth.
4. Upekkhฤ๐Ÿ›†๐Ÿ‘️: Equanimous-observation.




4. upekkha 

as a brahma vihara, uses the same emoji as upekkha in other Dhamma factors like 4th jhana, 7th awakening factor, etc. ๐Ÿ›†๐Ÿ‘️ The Triangle is an equilateral triangle representing balance, 'equanimity'.  It's also reminiscent of the Pyramid and eye on the tip. The eye emoticon, is the same one used for "right view". To tie in the idea in 7sb, that with a mind in samadhi, the equanimous-observation of upekkha, is easily purified to attain right view. 


1. metta

the two hands ๐Ÿค๐Ÿค—: are shaking, as in the modern western custom of friendly platonic gesture of good will. I originally followed Thanissaro in translating metta as 'good-will', but then realized I wanted to differentiate it from the abyapada (non-ill-will) that occurs frequently. Metta is closely related to "mitta" (friend), so I thought it would be good to re-establish that relationship with "friendly-kindness." Now I could have just used "friendliness", but "friendly-kindness" is a nice antidote to the frequent translation that B. Bodhi and Tibetan Buddhists use for metta, "loving-kindness." Love is loaded with too much entangled emotional baggage. Metta in the suttas, especially as a brahma-vihara, does not have that kind of connotation, as far as I've seen. If someone can show some EBT passages to suggest otherwise, I'd like to see it. 


2. karuna

Note the difference between ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜Š: and the metta emoji. Metta is more 'clingy' and emotional. The smiling face in metta has hands hugging the face. In karuna, the hands are open, a less clingy gesture and a more open attitude of wanting to help relieve beings from dukkha.


3. mudita

Now compared with karuna, mudita Muditฤ๐Ÿ˜Š  is just the smiling without the open hands. As we move from 1st 4bv, to 2nd, to third, mind becomes less clingy, more open and expansive. I like B. Bodhi's translation of mudita as "gladness", but I translate this as altruistic-mirth for a few reasons. One, there are so many words that mean 'happy', that I wanted to pick a 'happy' word that starts with 'm' to make it easy to learn the pali word and remember it. Second, 'pa-mojja' is a closely related word, that occurs in the 7sb along with Piti of piti-sambojjhanga, and I translate that as "mirth", so I wanted to establish and show the connection between pamojja of 7sb, mudita of 4bv, and abhi-p-pa-modaham cittam from 16APS.

For mudita, I preface the 'mirth' with 'altruistic', as in altruistic-mirth. This is to emphasize that as a 4bv brahmavihara, one doesn't just  have any generic type of joy, it's a happiness that delights in virtuous activity. That is, delighting in other beings keeping sila well, practicing the 8aam noble eightfold path well.


what sutta passage give detailed meaning of mudita in 4bv brahma-viharas?

Post by frank k » Tue Jun 18, 2019 4:34 pm


pa-mojja and piti often occur together, almost like synonyms.
(mudita is closely related to pa-mojja).

There are a number of passages where pamojja and piti has the role of being delighted, gladdened, in the context of 7sb awakening factors, that one's viriya and right effort are purifying the mind and sila.

But are there any sutta passages that explicitly establish the mudita as a 4bv factor, has the same function, in delighting in virtue and purification?

In Vimuttimagga, it also states that mudita is delighting in virtue.

But in Vism., it seems to go off on tangents, of being a type of joy in opposition to the negative emotion of jealousy. I'm interested in EBT passages that can justify Vism's tangent, or give explicit support for Vimt. interpretation, and the connection to 7sb piti-sambojjhanga and pa-mojja.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhฤna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhฤna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhฤna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhฤnas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhฤnas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhฤnas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex