Skip to main content

Simile of jhāna 🌄 mountain: ✅☸EBT jhāna, ⛔ABRJ, ⛔VRJ



✅☸EBT jhāna, is a different type of samādhi than ⛔ABRJ and  ⛔VRJ (vism.).
All of those samādhi systems work as advertised, but they have distinct qualitative differences.
It's not ok for ⛔VRJ (vism.) to redefine jhāna and then claim it's the same jhāna the Buddha teaches.
And it's definitely not ok for Ajahn Brahm to claim ⛔ABRJ is what the Buddha meant by ✅☸EBT jhāna.

It's really quite shocking that those claims are tolerated at all.
The problem isn't that some Buddhists prefer a different samādhi system than the one the Buddha taught.
The problem is that by inappropriately naming it the same as  ✅☸EBT jhāna, it's horribly confusing to the rest of the world,
especially newbies.
If one prefers ⛔ABRJ, that's fine, but one should be clear it's not the same as  ✅☸EBT jhāna.

The Simile of jhāna mountain

Based on the simile from MN 125. (these are clickable hyperlinks)
⛔VRJ (Vism. Re-definition of Jhāna)
⛔ABRJ (Ajahn Brahm Re-definition of Jhāna, same as Vism. Redefinition without abhidhamma theory)
Ajahn Brahm (Brahmavamso)


The way Vism. goes about redefining jhāna is explored in great detail here, with pali + english audit.

To explain it with an original simile, on the path to the ancient city of Nirvana, The Buddha has a sign that points to  ✅🌄jhāna mountain of MN 125. The Buddha promised a gradual path, and this includes jhāna samādhi. So the mountain has switchbacks, a gradually elevated path that spirals around the mountain, gently leading to the mountain peak. Anyone can climb this trail - young, old, experienced, inexperienced.

Buddhaghosa comes along, swaps out the sign that points to  ✅🌄jhāna mountain to point to a different mountain, which we'll call ⛔VRJ 🌄.  Now this VRJ mountain is an identical twin to the Buddha's. Identical in every way, except without the gradual spiraling path. Instead, it's a steep, direct and treacherous ascent up the face of the mountain. Only one in a million people can make it up to even first jhana, which is only 25% of the mountain height. 

A thousand years pass, and then Ajahn Brahm comes along. He purports to follow the EBT (Early Buddhist Texts), and not the Abhidhamma. So he removes Buddhaghosa's counterfeit sign, and replaces the Buddha's sign that points to the genuine  ✅🌄jhāna mountain. Yay Ajahn Brahm! 

But wait!

Then Ajahn Brahm is seen maniacally laughing, driving a backhoe, which is a mechanical excavation vehicle, up  ✅🌄jhāna mountain, and he proceeds to destroy the switchbacks, the gradual spiraling path that leads to the top of the mountain. When he's done, it looks identical to  ⛔VRJ 🌄. Meaning one has to take the steep, direct and treacherous ascent up the face of the mountain. Only one in a million people can make it up to even first jhana, which is only 25% of the mountain height. 

Do you see the problem now?

Trust in ✅☸EBT jhāna. Don't believe the counterfeits. 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex