Skip to main content

V&V💭 &U🛆👁: anu-vitakka, anu-vicara, anu-upekkha : jhana factors that do vipassana

Here are all the suttas that mentions these 3 factors together V&V💭   and 🛆👁 Upekkha

vimuttāyatanasuttaṃ (AN 5.26)
paṭhamadhammavihārīsuttaṃ (AN 5.73)
dutiyadhammavihārīsuttaṃ (AN 5.74)
dutiyasaddhammasammosasuttaṃ (AN 5.155)
ānandasuttaṃ (AN 6.51), para. 4
phaggunasuttaṃ (AN 6.56), para. 14 ⇒
pacalāyamānasuttaṃ (AN 7.61), para. 3 ⇒
DN 33
DN 34


AN 5.26  V&V&U occur in #4, 

but also look at 1,2,3, and notice that samadhi and first jhana are closely involved in hearing Dhamma, teaching, speaking Dhamma to teach others, V&V thinking and Upekkha (equanimous observation) of Dhamma. This is why SN 36.11 it's said that speech ceases in first jhana. It's exactly this kind of context, and sets a boundary condition where the energy required to speak, vibrate vocal cords and flap lips energetically is too intensive to give a sufficient kaya-passaddhi to maintain a first jhana.
(hyperlinks here to click)
AN 5.26 (Concise version with ellisions)


AN 5.73: 

this is is clear that the samatha, V&V&U are all factors in the context of jhana
4. ♦ “puna caparaṃ, bhikkhu, bhikkhu
4. “Then there is the case where a monk
yathā-sutaṃ
takes the Dhamma as he has heard
yathā-pariyattaṃ dhammaṃ
& studied it
cetasā anu-vitakketi anu-vicāreti
and thinks about it, evaluates it,
manas-ān-upekkhati.
and examines it with his intellect.
so tehi dhamma-vitakkehi divasaṃ atināmeti,
He spends the day in Dhamma-thinking.
riñcati paṭisallānaṃ,
He neglects seclusion.
nānuyuñjati ajjhattaṃ ceto-samathaṃ.
He doesn’t commit himself to internal tranquility of awareness.
ayaṃ vuccati, bhikkhu —
This is called
‘bhikkhu vitakka-bahulo,
a monk who is keen on thinking,
no dhammavihārī’”.
not one who dwells in the Dhamma.
...
...
anuyuñjati ajjhattaṃ cetosamathaṃ.
He commits himself to internal tranquility of awareness.
evaṃ kho, bhikkhu, bhikkhu dhammavihārī hoti.
This is called a monk who dwells in the Dhamma.
♦ “iti kho, bhikkhu, desito mayā pariyattibahulo, desito paññattibahulo, desito sajjhāyabahulo, desito vitakkabahulo, desito dhammavihārī.
“Now, monk, I have taught you the person who is keen on study, the one who is keen on description, the one who is keen on recitation, the one who is keen on thinking, and the one who dwells in the Dhamma.
yaṃ kho, bhikkhu VAR, satthārā karaṇīyaṃ sāvakānaṃ hitesinā anukampakena anukampaṃ upādāya, kataṃ vo taṃ mayā.
Whatever a teacher should do—seeking the welfare of his disciples, out of sympathy for them—that have I done for you.
etāni, bhikkhu, rukkhamūlāni,
Over there are the roots of trees;
etāni suññāgārāni.
over there, empty dwellings.
jhāyatha, bhikkhu, mā pamādattha,
Practice jhāna, monk. Don’t be heedless.
mā pacchā vippaṭisārino ahuvattha.
Don’t later fall into regret.
ayaṃ vo amhākaṃ anusāsanī”ti.
This is our message to you.”


AN 5.74 (sequel to above)

explains the difference between V&V&U outside of four jhanas,
to the V&V&U within 4  jhanas (ceto-samatha).
Puna caparaṃ, bhikkhu, bhikkhu yathāsutaṃ yathāpariyattaṃ dhammaṃ cetasā anuvitakketi anuvicāreti manasānupekkhati, uttari cassa paññāya atthaṃ nappajānāti.
Furthermore, a monk thinks about and considers the teaching in their heart, examining it with the mind as they learned and memorized it. But they don’t understand the higher meaning.
Ayaṃ vuccati, bhikkhu: ‘bhikkhu vitakkabahulo, no dhammavihārī’.
That monk is called one who thinks a lot, not one who lives by the teaching.

Idha, bhikkhu, bhikkhu dhammaṃ pariyāpuṇāti—
Take a monk who memorizes the teaching—
suttaṃ, geyyaṃ, veyyākaraṇaṃ, gāthaṃ, udānaṃ, itivuttakaṃ, jātakaṃ, abbhutadhammaṃ, vedallaṃ;
statements, songs, discussions, verses, inspired sayings, legends, stories of past lives, amazing stories, and analyses.
uttari cassa paññāya atthaṃ pajānāti.
And they do understand the higher meaning.
Evaṃ kho, bhikkhu, bhikkhu dhammavihārī hoti.
That’s how a monk is one who lives by the teaching.


AN 5.155 not doing V&V&U leads to decline of Dhamma


Puna caparaṃ, bhikkhave, bhikkhū yathāsutaṃ yathāpariyattaṃ dhammaṃ na cetasā anuvitakkenti anuvicārenti manasānupekkhanti.
Furthermore, the monks don’t think about and consider the teaching in their hearts, examining it with their minds as they learned and memorized it.
Ayaṃ, bhikkhave, pañcamo dhammo saddhammassa sammosāya antaradhānāya saṃvattati.
This is the fifth thing that leads to the decline and disappearance of the true teaching.



AN 6.51 again V&V&U in oral tradition learning context

this sutta gives nice detail of how learning and memorizing, finding teachers to ask right questions, works in the oral tradition. And makes it absolutely clear why V&V has to mean thinking and evaluation - not a frozen trance for first jhana. 
“Idhāvuso sāriputta, bhikkhu dhammaṃ pariyāpuṇāti—
“Reverend Sāriputta, take a monk who memorizes the teaching—
suttaṃ geyyaṃ veyyākaraṇaṃ gāthaṃ udānaṃ itivuttakaṃ jātakaṃ abbhutadhammaṃ vedallaṃ.
statements, songs, discussions, verses, inspired sayings, legends, stories of past lives, amazing stories, and analyses.
So yathāsutaṃ yathāpariyattaṃ dhammaṃ vitthārena paresaṃ deseti, yathāsutaṃ yathāpariyattaṃ dhammaṃ vitthārena paresaṃ vāceti, yathāsutaṃ yathāpariyattaṃ dhammaṃ vitthārena sajjhāyaṃ karoti, yathāsutaṃ yathāpariyattaṃ dhammaṃ cetasā anuvitakketi anuvicāreti manasānupekkhati.
Then, just as they learned and memorized it, they teach others in detail, make them recite in detail, practice reciting in detail, and think about and consider the teaching in their heart, examining it with the mind.

AN 6.56 jhana not explicitly mentioned, but...

do you seriously think V&V&U is occuring in ordinary thinking, outside of four jhanas, to attain arahantship?
(hyperlinks to click here)



AN 7.61 Doesn't explicitly mention 4 jhanas here, but...

Moggallana attained arahantship in 2 weeks time, not too long after meeting Buddha, is the poster child for the 4ip (iddhipada, basically synonymous of mastery of 4th jhana). This sutta is about ways to overcome drowsiness. Knowing all this about moggallana, when is ever not in 4th jhana quality of mind? When he's tired and needs sleep, or food coma.

AN 7.61 Pacalāyana

DN 33 same passage as AN 5.26

DN 33 basically is a giant sutta composed of smaller suttas including AN 5.26


DN 34

not sure where the V&V&U are, might be elided out of some editions

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex