Skip to main content

How Vism. differentiates between the rupa in their 4 redefined jhānas, and the arupa attainments


@Frank In the Vism. system, how are formless jhanas differentiated from the 4 jhanas ? Because as far as I know there is only awareness of the light as an object.

my response:

In this detailed audit, if you compare the vimutti-magga and visuddhi-magga (see the respective section on each) on how they handle the base of infinite space, you'll see how vimt. is EBT compliant, in differentiating 1st arupa infinite space and the four jhanas, whereas Vism. is a corrupted abomination, and their rationalization for it is one of the stupidest excuses you'll ever have the chance to witness.

http://lucid24.org/sted/8aam/8samadhi/ebt-vs-vism/index.html


In Vism., it's not just visual light perception, you can use most of the 10 kasinas to attain infinite space. The difference between VRJ (vism. redefinition of jhana) 1st jhana, and infinite space, using earth kasina as an example, is that for infinite space you would stretch out the earth kasina gradually making it larger and larger, and then eventually remove the kasina and just switch your perception to the infinite space.  But prior to that, VRJ first jhana earth kasina, and infinite space earth kasina, both have 5 senses shut off and are exactly the same. You can't hear sounds, can't feel mosquito bites, can  not tell where your hands, fingers, toes are, your body perception is gone.

Whereas in Vimt., which uses an earlier less corrupted version of Abhdhamma, and in the EBT, the four jhanas you do perceive your body, can hear sounds, can feel mosquito bites.

Here's an EBT analysis of how the rupa (that can feel mosquito bites) is glossed in the passages relevant to base of infinite space
http://lucid24.org/sted/8aam/8samadhi/smd5/index.html

In EBT and Vimt., rupa in four jhanas refers to your physical body.

In Vism's VRJ four jhanas,  rupa means the 'mind created visual earth kasina', for how could rupa refer to a physical body that is beyond one's perception in first jhana?
(I'm paraphrasing, but it really is as stupid as it sounds, and blind faith followers of late Theravada accept it without question).


follow up question

Thanks for clearing that up, but my point kind of was Ajahn Brahm says when the nimitta absorbs you , there is no more "willing", there is just the light, then how can he tell whether he is in first jhana or the second jhana or the formless ones? This seems contradictory.

Yes, that's another big thing VRJ (vism. redefinition of jhana) and Ajahn brahm adds to 'jhana'. That one can not will/intend, examine, understand, while in that frozen state. Only after one has emerged from this frozen state can one examine and reflect on what happened.

In EBT, you can do all of that type of examination. That's exactly what sati, sampajano, and upekkha do in the 3rd and 4th jhana. This is why Vism. also created a '5 jhana factors' model, that eliminates upekkha, and redefines vitakka and vicara into a non thinking action. 

I like what B. Gunaratana said. If you're in a frozen state when you can't do any kind of examination, don't even know whether you're in a jhana, that's called 'wrong samadhi.' 

Comments

  1. Thanks for clearing that up, but my point kind of was Ajahn Brahm says when the nimitta absorbs you , there is no more "willing", there is just the light, then how can he tell whether he is in first jhana or the second jhana or the formless ones? This seems contradictory.

    ReplyDelete
  2. reply in updated blog post (this one)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks a lot frankk. I was looking at sutta 41.8 from the Samyutta Nikaya, where Nigantha Nataputta asks Citta the householder, that whether there is a concentration without thought and examination, and that stopping thoughts and examination is like catching wind in a net, and also in MN 44 it is said vitakka-vicara is verbal fabrication. This leads to only one conclusion that it is indeed thoughts and examination, I don't know how can people try to misconstrue this.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex