Skip to main content

the true connection between the eightfold path/ethics on one hand, and jhanas on the other.



(from an Article by William Chu)

I've always wondered the true connection between the eightfold path/ethics on one hand, and jhanas on the other.

If jhanas are something neutrally concentrative, which can in theory be equally developed by staring at a nimitta, focusing on a mantra, and practicing calligraphy, the all-important ethical-behavioral dimension is left out.

To the Buddha, jhana always carries with it an ethical dimension, an intention-molding/sloping teleology, a habit-changing-behavior-shaping conditioning effect, a task tied to each of the noble truths...

If pressed, the following is how I would characterize jhanas:

--the mind firmly resolved on disenchantment, dispassion, and/or cessation (can be on some facet of them), always moving in that direction, all the while experiencing the confidence, joy, pleasure, equanimity, or serenity that invariably comes from the mind moving in that direction

--the heightening and balancing of the seven factors of awakening, for the purpose of cultivating disenchantment, dispassion, and/or cessation (e.g. mindfulness--remembering the Dhammic mission, the why and how of inducing disenchantment etc.; be ablaze and passionate and ardent about such a task and goal, all the while keeping the blaze steady and potent...)

--not allowing the mind to distract from a samana's abode: cultivating non-carnal enjoyment to replace household resolves, concerns, memories; wholeheartedly and consistently savor contentment, seclusion, Dhamma passion, shedding off of burdens...

--approximating and duplicating a liberated samana's min, which is: vast, unobstructed, not burned by passion, signless (free from canker-inducing impressions), empty (not dwelling on me and mine), unwrinkled, unstuck, bright, alert, discerning [for the purpose of Dhamma]; approximation is one of the best ways to unlearn/decondition habits/addictions, and is not a lesser practice or being a mere preliminary to the so-called "vipassana practice"; the cultivation of citta, the removal of hindrances is not simply a strictly samatha practice. According to the suttas, it is the liberative path in its own right.

--all of the above are detailed in the sixteen steps. The sixteen steps need not be linear. They are situational, dynamic, open-ended, and can fluidly move from one step to the other. Jhana is the steadying, fluid transitioning, situational resilience, undistracted execution...of any and all the 16 steps

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex