Skip to main content

AN 4.180, DN 16.22 Four Great References, validating whether it's legitimate Dhamma, or not


AN 4.180 Mahāpadesa: The Four Great References

(99% translation by B. Sujato‍ )
    AN 4.180 - AN 4.180 Mahāpadesa: The Four Great References
        AN 4.180.1 - (if you hear and memorize Dhamma from one who heard Buddha)
            AN 4.180.1.1 - (⛔if memory conflicts with suttas and vinaya, you must reject your memory as corrupted Dhamma)
            AN 4.180.1.2 - (✅☸if memory agrees with suttas and vinaya, your memory of Dhamma is confirmed)
        AN 4.180.2 - (if you hear and memorize Dhamma from leaders and senior monastic sangha)
            AN 4.180.2.1 - (⛔if memory conflicts with suttas and vinaya, you must reject your memory as corrupted Dhamma)
            AN 4.180.2.2 - (✅☸if memory agrees with suttas and vinaya, your memory of Dhamma is confirmed)
        AN 4.180.3 - (if you hear and memorize Dhamma from several learned senior monastics)
            AN 4.180.3.1 - (⛔if memory conflicts with suttas and vinaya, you must reject your memory as corrupted Dhamma)
            AN 4.180.3.2 - (✅☸if memory agrees with suttas and vinaya, your memory of Dhamma is confirmed)
        AN 4.180.4 - (if you hear and memorize Dhamma from a senior monastic)
            AN 4.180.4.1 - (⛔if memory conflicts with suttas and vinaya, you must reject your memory as corrupted Dhamma)
            AN 4.180.4.2 - (✅☸if memory agrees with suttas and vinaya, your memory of Dhamma is confirmed)

 

Same sutta occurs in DN 16.22

https://lucid24.org/dn/main/dn16/index.html#16.22

DN 16 is the sutta where the Buddha gives instructions on what happens after he dies.

So this sutta is important.

The essence of it should be memorized, and applied (sati, "mindfulness").


Easy way to memorize the essence of this sutta

There are 4 references, if you use them correctly, you identify correct Dhamma.

Incorrect Dhamma is 180 degrees away, the opposite direction of correct Dhamma (360 degrees is a circle).

This sutta is conveniently numbered AN 4.180

The four references are progressively less reliable source of hearing Dhamma that you memorize.

1. you heard and learned and memorized Dhamma from someone who actually heard it from the Buddha himself.

2. the source is a number of elder leaders and senior monks

3. the source is a number of learned senior monks

4. the source is a single learned monk


If the Dhamma you memorized and heard from your source matches the suttas and vinaya, then it's correct Dhamma.

If it doesn't match, then your memory was faulty, or the source gave you incorrect Dhamma and should  be rejected.


If people actually memorized and applied the 4 great references...

Many controversies would be resolved quickly.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex
Post a Comment
Read more