Skip to main content

puñña: what has more merit? Acts of kindness or meditation?

 

4👑☸ → EBpedia📚 → puñña 



what has more merit? Acts of kindness or meditation?

KN Iti 27 worldly merit, none are worth a sixteenth part of the heart’s release by friendly-kindness

AN 9.20 successfully more meritorious activities, meditation trumps generosity

SN 20.4 a moment of metta more meritorious than offering 100 meals

DN 5.5 successfully more meritorious activities, with 4 jhānas and 6 higher knowleges at peak




sīla and dāna just as important as samādhi?



And some comments I made in this discussion,

where someone thinks sīla is not inferior to samādhi as described in suttas above

https://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?p=762125#p762125




You're missing the point. No one is saying sīla is unnecessary, just because it's inferior to paññā and samādhi.
It's about the ceiling.
Someone who only does sila but not samādhi has a low ceiling, can not break through to nirvana.
Someone with sīla and samādhi has arahntship as a ceiling.
Someone with no sīla, corrupted sīla, with excellent samādhi, can not have right samādhi and also would have a very low ceiling preventing awakening.



See SN 56.1.


Someone can have the best sila in the world, best demeanor in the world, even better than everyone with samādhi, but without samādhi, they can't break through to pañña and awakening.
At best they'll just be reborn in favorable realms again and again until they slip up, but always revolving in samsara, just having better karmic fruits than those without sila.
That's the 'ceiling' I refer to.
Someone with the best samādhi in the world, but doesn't direct it towards seeing the 4 noble truths, will also be stuck in samsara revolving.
Somone with the best samādhi but with poor sīla, will also fall and continue to revolve.




Akashad wrote:

For example,if I wanted a good rebirth or good circumstances wouldn't it be more beneficial for me to practice Dana and Sila than meditation.


...See my previous answer, but in a sense yes, if you're chasing good karmic rewards and want the slowest way to attain nirvana but in the most comfortable way then focusing time and effort more on sīla and dāna could have more tangible favorable impact.

For example, some monks who get 4 requisites very easily while other monks struggle to get any,
could be a result of the former doing better dāna and sīla in past lives.

But the goal should be to attain nirvana as soon as possible, and get out of suffering ASAP,
which is why the Buddha places even a finger snap's time of metta as more meritorious than dāna and sīla,
and why the jhānas and perceiving a moment of impermanence even more meritorious than that.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex
Post a Comment
Read more