Skip to main content

First responder action to anger, even righteous anger: wise selfishness

 


What works best for me, to get rid of anger, no matter how justified it is,  is to just focus on wise selfishness.
That is, I want what's best for myself.
Anger damages my qi, my health, my spiritual practice, etc.
I want to be in optimum health with maximum qi to be in the strongest position to attain awakening.
So the first, immediate first responder reaction to anger I try to cultivate, is to remember (sati, "mindfulness") to be selfish (in a wise way), look out for number one, value my own well being, do no harm to myself, the person I care about most in this world, nurture that basic instinct to be good to myself and minimize any harmful effects to my own health that anger anger can cause.

Especially when there's righteous anger to a grave evil done, we have a tendency to justify to ourselves it's ok and reasonable to be angry in the situation. But in the heat of anger we forget this does great harm to ourselves.

Besides, if we've already been victimized by someone once, every time we get angry, it's like giving them a free punch or a knife to stab us again and again every time we remember the evil they did. The anger of recalling it just harms ourselves again and again. Really senseless if you think about it. Why would you let the evil perpetrator victimize you not just once, but multiple times? For days? For years? Even for lifetimes with angry ghosts seeking revenge getting pay back hundreds of years later.
 
But in the heat of anger all rationality disappears, and we're not going to be able to apply the Dharma.
So that's why I find it's easiest to cultivate the basic instinct of self preservation, remembering that anger does great harm to our self. 
So protect ourselves first, ask questions and find long term solutions later.

Afterwards, from a calm state of mind, then work on all the typical good strategies taught in the suttas to get rid of anger permanently in a Dharmic way. 

"do jhana first, ask questions later."

Another thing I try to do when working through anger and forgiveness, is remember the mantra,
"do jhana first, ask questions later."
So get in a jhana state of mind first, and then equanimously work through the thought process. If anger comes in, pause, take a time out, go back into jhana first before resuming working through of issues.
This goes hand in hand with the wise selfishness of self preservation, being kind to ourselves first and not harming ourselves.

2. byāpādo😠 / ill-will

2. byāpādo😠 / ill-will (of the 5 hindrances)


Comments

  1. This is me every time someone says Satipatthana and Jhana are different.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex