Skip to main content

vimt. gloss of 'vivicceva kamehi' is DESIRE for sensual pleasures, not "5 sensual pleasure objects"

 Again, google translate AI, even with its crude translation and mistakes, has a much better understanding of first jhana than Ajahn Brahm.

fascicle 4:

(first zen = first jhana)

問:
ask:
云何修地法?
How to cultivate the land?
答:
answer:
若坐禪人欲修地一切入,從初當觀欲過患,復應觀出離功德。
If the person who sits in meditation wants to cultivate all the ground, he should observe the troubles of desire from the beginning, and then he should observe the merits of renunciation.
問:
ask:
何故應觀欲過患?
Why should watch desire be too troublesome?
答:
answer:
欲者少氣味,故多憂苦,於是處多過患。
Desires have less smell, so more sorrow, so more troubles.
欲者如骨,喻少氣味。
Desires are like bones, but less smell.
欲者如[3]肉揣喻,以多屬故。
Desires are like [3] fleshy metaphors, with many reasons.
欲者如逆風把火喻,隨燒故。
Desires interpret fire like a headwind, and burn it as they go.
欲者如炎炭喻,大小故。
Desires are like charcoal metaphors, big and small.
欲者如夢喻,倏忽無故。
Desires are like dreams, suddenly and without reason.
欲者如借物喻,勢不得久[4]故。
Desires, like borrowing things, will not last long [4].
欲者如樹果喻,為人所折故。
Desires are like a tree and fruit, and they are made by others.
欲者如刀喻,以斬斫故。
Desires are like a sword metaphor, to chop the past.
欲者如槊喻,以為槊故。
Desires are like metaphors, thinking that they are so.
欲者如毒蛇頭喻,可怖畏故。
Desires are like a snake head, terrible and fearful.
欲者如風吹綿喻,不可守護故。
Desires are like the wind blowing, and cannot guard the cause.
欲者如幻喻,惑癡人故。
Desires are like illusions, confused and foolish.
欲者是暗,無所見故。
Desires are dark and see nothing.
欲者是障礙路,礙諸善法故。
Desires are obstacles, hindering all good things.
欲者是癡,失正念故。
Desires are idiots and lose their righteous thoughts.
欲者如熟,以爛故。
Desires are as familiar, but rotten.
欲者是械,相駐縛故。
Desires are weapons, which are bound to each other.
欲者是盜,功德物故。
Desires are thief, merit and virtue.
欲者是怨家,起鬪爭故。
Desires are grudges and quarrel.
欲者是苦,造諸過患故。
Desires are suffering, causing all lapses and sufferings.
如是已觀欲過患,應觀出離功德。
If you have already contemplated desires, you should see the merits.
名出離者,謂初禪從初出家修諸善,是名出離。
The person who is famous for being renounced means that the first Zen has cultivated all virtues since the beginning of the renunciation, which is the renunciation of the name.    





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex