Skip to main content

MN 10, DN 22: video (7min) of how a skilled lathe worker works with the wood

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/theravada/comments/l51tto/how_was_ancient_woodturning_done_useful_for/

How was ancient wood-turning done? Useful for understanding the simile of the wood-turner in the Maha-satipatthana sutta.

In the section on anapana (breathing meditation) in the maha-satipatthana sutta, there is this simile (to represent the way in which one knows the inhale and the exhale in breathing meditation)

Just as a clever wood turner, or a wood turner’s apprentice, when he makes a long pull [on the lathe], he knows clearly ‘I make a long pull.’

It's hard to understand this properly without knowing how wood-turning worked in India at that time. And I think it is worth trying to understand well, because the Buddha does not give a simile for no reason. After a little research, I found that woodturning at that time was done in much the same way as it still is, in North Africa and parts of India and Asia, using a hand-powered bow-lathe. Here is a video of one wood-turner in Morocco plying his trade: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnv0DAR_gWA

The key word that is used in the simile is añchati- (stretch, pull, drag to turn along a lathe) it's this that is said to be "long" or "short". It's clear enough from watching the woodturner in the video work that this refers to the back and forth movement he makes continually with his arm.

He can adjust the length of his movement as he wishes. To me seeing this also helps to make clear the meaning of the simile. (A "skilled woodturner" - as opposed to an unskilled one - knows the purpose of every movement he makes, and he is well practiced so that he will not adjust the length of his pull impulsively for no reason, without being conscious of doing so. As one says about anyone who is skilled in their trade, he "knows what he is doing." My understanding, is that it is in this way that one should clearly and skilfully "know what one is doing" when breathing in and out.)

Postscript: On a similar subject, I wonder if anyone would have some insight into the other simile in the same sutta, regarding mindfulness with reference to the four elements. It is said to be like a "skilled butcher or butcher's apprentice, who, having killed a cow, sits down at a crossroads dividing it into portions or heaps."

So far the best analysis I can make is that when butchering any animal for meat, one always has to divide the meat into different categories: bones, tough meat for stew, tender meat for steak, and what is left that can only be given to animals. Dividing the entire cow and all that is within it into basic different categories which depend only on the physical nature of the material, is similar to dividing this human body and everything in it into the four elements of which it is made.

But I'm not quite satisfied with this, in particular I don't see why the reference to a "crossroads" - it doesn't seem key to the point that is being made, but I wonder all the same what it is about - does it perhaps refer to some ancient Indian custom or tradition of which I am unaware?


As I recall, in Ven. Sona's 'nimitta' article where he discusses this wood worker simile,

he uses that to show that parimukha for 16aps breath meditation must mean close attention to the nostril area, staying anchored there the way a woodworker must.

He may be right, but two important things to note:

  1. Some agama parallels do not have that woodworker simile for breath at all in their satipatthana suttas

  2. parimukha with sitting down meditation instructions occurs for many other meditations besides just breath meditation, that have nothing to do with nostril and mouth area, so we have to conclude that parimukha is meant in a figurative sense of making the task in "front" of you the top priority. Just as 'focusing on the task on hand' doesn't mean the literal hand for most cases.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex