Skip to main content

In Pali, is there a general rule for how to translate/interpret negations, e.g. (subha, asubha)


In Pali, is there a general rule for how to translate/interpret negations, e.g. (subha, asubha)

Post by frank k » Thu Feb 27, 2020 11:33 am
In Pali, is there a general rule for how to translate/interpret negations, e.g. (subha, asubha)
After all these years, I still have no idea.

For example:
In English, if we contrast beautiful with non-beautiful,
non-beautiful has a broad spectrum from not beautiful at all, all the way to extreme beauty.

Similary, if we were to translate subha/asubha as not-ugly, and ugly,
then 'ugly' tends to imply, 'more than a little ugly', but not-ugly has a range from not ugly at all, to extremely ugly.

atta, anatta
nicca, anicca
abypada, bypada

How do you translate and interpret those?

For subha and asubha, the passages definitely seem to be on the extreme end in context. If one only had a neutral attitude to contemplating 31 body parts or corpses, you wouldn't expect to see scores of suicide in SN 54.9 for example.
And subha-nimitta, the sign of beauty, is definitely not average beauty, it's something very enticing of lust and passion.

So is there a general rule for negation pairs in pali?

What about byapada and abyapada in right resolve?
B. Bodhi and Thanissaro translate it literally, so I've always interpreted abyapada as 'non-ill will', a spectrum from neutrality to very kind. Whereas B. Sujato translates (and presumably interprets it) as 'good will', making it nearly synonymous with 4 brahmaviharas. (the word 'abyapajjena pharitva viharati' appears in the formula for all four). In the context of right resolve, it makes more sense to have the spectrum of meaning, than to have an injunction for followers to always force a positive attitude and be nice to everyone.

So is there a general rule, or we have to check case by case for each pali word?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha
Post a Comment
Read more

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a
Post a Comment
Read more

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex
Post a Comment
Read more