Skip to main content

vitakka in first jhāna, spelled out so you can't hide from the truth


🚫💑 vivicc’eva kāmehi
🚫💑 Quite-withdrawn (from) sensuality,
🚫😠 vivicca a-kusalehi dhammehi
🚫😠 withdrawn (from) un-skillful Dhamma [teachings & qualities],
(V&V💭) sa-vitakkaṃ sa-vicāraṃ
(V&V💭) With-directed-thought, with-evaluation,
😁🙂 viveka-jaṃ pīti-sukhaṃ
😁🙂 withdrawal-born rapture-&-pleasure,
🌘 paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja viharati.
🌘 first Jhāna (he) enters, dwells.


Notice the sutta titles of these 3 suttas!

They're the only suttas in the whole canon titled that way, explicitly giving you critical information about first jhana.
AN 6.75 is really the 3rd of that set, and could have been titled "3rd sutta explaining first jhana".

The content of those thoughts, unlike ordinary V&V, must be kusala (skillful) related to Dharma (AN 6.73AN 6.74AN 6.75).
Otherwise, vitakka & vicāra in 1st Jhāna🌘 is intrinsically the same in 1st jhāna as it is outside of it.
So long as the thinking is attenuated, not too frequent and intense to tire the body and block kāya-passaddhi (bodily pacification), pīti & sukha (MN 19).

From AN 6.75, we see that the vitakka of first jhana, expanded out, is:

(dittha dhamma sukha vihara = first 3 jhanas, AN 6.29AN 4.41)

Chahi, bhikkhave, dhammehi samannāgato bhikkhu
When a monk has six dharmas
diṭṭheva dhamme sukhaṃ viharati
they live happily in the present life—
...

(These 3 kusala Dharma thoughts in first jhana, MN 19MN 78MN 125)

Nekkhamma-vitakkena,
1. renunciation-thought, [especially as opposed to kāma/lust-passion]
a-byāpāda-vitakkena,
2. non-ill-will-thought, [of good will]
a-vihiṃsā-vitakkena,
3. non-harming-thought, [of compassion]

KN Pe 7.72 gloss of first jhana formula explains V&V based on those 3 vitakkas also:


♦ vitakkāti tayo vitakkā —
578. Directed thought: There are three kinds of directed thought, namely
nekkhammavitakko
the thought of renunciation,
abyāpādavitakko
the thought of non-aversion,
avihiṃsāvitakko.
and the thought of harmlessness.
tattha paṭham-ābhinipāto vitakko,
579. Here, directed thought is the first instance
paṭiladdhassa vicaraṇaṃ vicāro.
while evaluation is the evaluation of what is thereby received.


Even canonical Abhidhamma agrees! From Te Ab Vb 12 jhana gloss

“Accompanied by directed-thought, accompanied by evaluation” [means]:
“Sa-vitakkaṃ sa-vicāran”ti
There is directed-thought; there is evaluation.
atthi vitakko, atthi vicāro.
Therein what is directed-thought?
Tattha katamo vitakko?
That which is speculative-thought, directed-thought,
Yo takko vitakko
resolve [a thought-formation or fashioning a thought],
saṅkappo
fixing, firm-fixing,
appanā by-appanā
application of the mind,
cetaso abhiniropanā
right-resolve.
sammā-saṅkappo
This is called directed-thought.
ayaṃ vuccati “vitakko”.


You plug in samma sankappo standard definition,
STED right-resolve
And what is right resolve? (SN 45.8)
Nekkhamma-saṅkappo,
Renunciation-resolve,
A-byāpāda-saṅkappo,
Non-ill-will-resolve,
A-vihiṃsā-saṅkappo —
Non-harmfulness-resolve

And that's basically equivalent in this context to our AN 6.75 from the beginning:
Nekkhamma-vitakkena,
1. renunciation-thought, [especially as opposed to kāma/lust-passion]
a-byāpāda-vitakkena,
2. non-ill-will-thought, [of good will]
a-vihiṃsā-vitakkena,
3. non-harming-thought, [of compassion]


Vimutti magga, based on the early Abhidhamma,  agrees with the above, and their first jhana gloss is very similar, even using most of the exact same examples as KN Pe.

Only in Vism., where they have an agenda to redefine jhana to conform to their radical momentariness redefinition of Abhidhamma, does vitakka take on a different meaning than above.  They can't actually redefine the Abhidhamma definition, so what they do instead is just segregate and confine the 3 types of first jhana vitakka to upacara samadhi, access concentration.

So in genuine Buddha Dhamma, first jhana vitakka, plugging back into standard first jhana formula:


🚫💑 vivicc’eva kāmehi
🚫💑 Quite-withdrawn (from) sensuality,
🚫😠 vivicca a-kusalehi dhammehi
🚫😠 withdrawn (from) un-skillful Dhamma [teachings & qualities],

(V&V💭) With-directed-thought, with-evaluation,
sa-Nekkhamma-vitakka,
1. with renunciation-thought, 
sa-a-byāpāda-vitakka,
2. with non-ill-will-thought,
sa-a-vihiṃsā-vitakka,
3. with non-harming-thought, 
😁🙂 viveka-jaṃ pīti-sukhaṃ
😁🙂 withdrawal-born rapture-&-pleasure,
🌘 paṭhamaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja viharati.
🌘 first Jhāna (he) enters, dwells.

Whenever you see the first jhana formula, that's what you should see your mind, with vitakka in first jhana spelled out. In the EBT, there is no earth kasina first jhana with a redefinition overriding that definition. So when Ajahn Brahm and B. Sujato try to claim otherwise, they are completely without basis.

Proof:

• explicit: every. single. reference. to vitakka in the suttas

You'll not find any redefinition in there. Besides, if there was one, you can bet Buddhaghosa would have pointed it out in Vism. The fact that they have to redefine vitakka in earth kasina first jhana tells you right there it didn't exist. It didn't even exist in canonical Abhidhamma!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex