Skip to main content

V&V (vitakka & vicara) simile of bird spreading wings corrupted by Vism.

400 BCE: Pari-nibbāna of the Buddha
200 BCE: Abhidhamma is not EBT
101 BCE(?) KN Pe = Peṭakopadesa
1 CE Vimt. = Vimutti-magga
500 CE Vism = Visuddhi-magga

The simile of bird spreading wings comes from

KN Pe 7.72: word cmy on four jhānas

 on V&V
yathā pakkhī
581. and just as a winged bird
pubbaṃ āyūhati
first accumulates [speed]
pacchā nāyūhati
and afterwards no more accumulates [speed, when gliding],
yathā āyūhanā evaṃ vitakko,
so too, thinking is like the accumulation [of speed],
yathā pakkhānaṃ pasāraṇaṃ evaṃ vicāro anupālati vitakketi vicarati vicāreti.
and like the out-stretchedness of the [gliding bird's] wings is exploring,
vitakkayati vitakketi,
[which] keeps preserving the thinkings
anuvicarati vicāreti.
and keeps preserving the explorings.

The meaning of the simile, when you read the entire V&V section, the recurring pattern is to show that vicara is connected to vitakka, and not some completely independent separate entity. The bird taking off and gliding requires that dependent connection. Vism. Has a completely different interpretation of the simile, they turn ‘vicara’ from its ‘exploring’ function into a ‘holding still’ in one pointed mind blanking out.

Like a bird taking off from a hill flapping its wings, is directed-thoughtof thought and the planing movement (of a bird in the sky) is evaluation of thought {vicāra}.
The first spreading (of the wings) is directed-thought {vitakka}.
The spreading (of the wings) when it is continued {a}long is evaluation of thought {vicāra}

Vimuttimagga pretty much preserves the meaning of KN Pe simile. 


Now we come to Vism., which completely destroys the simile


89.And, though sometimes not separate, applied thought is the first impact of the mind in the sense that it is both gross and inceptive, like the striking of a bell. Sustained thought is the act of keeping the mind anchored, in the sense that it is subtle with the individual essence of continued pressure, like the ringing of the bell.  Applied thought intervenes, being the interference of consciousness at the time of first arousing [thought], like a bird’s spreading out its wings when about to soar into the air, and like a bee’s diving towards a lotus when it is minded to follow up the scent of it. The behaviour of sustained thought is quiet, being the near non-interference of consciousness, like the bird’s planing with outspread wings after soaring into the air, and like the bee’s buzzing above the lotus after it has dived towards it.
90. In the commentary to the Book of Twos26 this is said: (Vitakka) “Applied thought occurs as a state of directing the mind onto an object, like the movement of a large bird taking off into the air by engaging the air with both wings and forcing them downwards. For it causes absorption by being unified. Sustained thought occurs with the individual essence of continued pressure, like the bird’s movement when it is using (activating) its wings for the purpose of (vicara) keeping
hold on the air. For it keeps pressing the object27”. That fits in with the latter’s occurrence as anchoring. This difference of theirs becomes evident in the first and second jhānas [in the fivefold reckoning].

comment: Vicara, etymologically means 'explore', 'walk about', 'wander', but in Vism. first jhāna, the meaning becomes the complete opposite! To 'hold still', 'sustain the stillness' of being frozen in appana samadhi.

Here's a more accurate simile of the bird and wings for Vism.

Buddhaghosa keeps a pet bird. He has the wings clipped so he can't fly away. He has a blindfold on the bird because in first jhana, you can't see or hear sounds. Most of the time, Buddhaghosa keeps the bird  in a tiny box that's dark and so small the bird can not even walk around. So small, it's "fixed" (appana) in place. The bird can't even turn and rotate, can't spread its wings. The box is completely enclosed, with pinholes so the pet bird can breathe and stay alive. But bird has to conserve oxygen so it's afraid to chirp.

It wants to get out of its tiny box, so it tries to spread it's wings. That's vitakka. The 'initial attempt' at extending its wings to escape.
The lid to the box doesn't budge. The Bird keeps exerting force on the lid with its wings. That's 'vicara', 'sustained application' of the wings trying to escape from this cruel torture of being ekaggata  'one pointed' in a tiny box where he can't see, can't hear, can't chirp, can't move, can't live properly.

Image result for bird in tiny cageImage result for bird tortureImage result for chicken egg farm

In Contrast, in genuine Buddha Dhamma first jhāna,

The bird is grounded, mired in sensuality and askuala dharmas, so he skillfully uses vitakka with his wings to flap, build up speed and ascend into the sky. That's vitakka. Directing, 'fixing upon' (appana, the original meaning in KN Pe) a kusala/skillful topic to replace the akusala (unskillful).
He then continues to flap the wings or hold them steady, in order to 'explore' and 'search for' the island of nirvana safe from the defilements. That's 'Vicara'. Evaluation/exploration/pondering/examination of the directed skillful Dharma thought of flying from the ground to the sky.

Image result for bird soaringImage result for bird soaring

Other great qualities alluded to by original KN Pe bird simile

KN Pe 7.72: word cmy on four jhānas

When one flies, soars, descends, inverts, sharp turns, the strong g-forces acting on the body, not just from free falling bodies, but also the centripetal accleration when making sharp turns, are reminiscent of the strong physical forces of piti & sukha exerted on the physical body in first and second jhana. In Jhana, it often does feel like you're suddenly lifting off and flying or levitating. 

Also being in the open sky, having the vision of undistractible lucidty to survey the entire world, the feeling of spaciousness is the quality of genuine jhana.

Vism. redefinition of jhāna, it's possible to get to the same place as genuine first jhana, but the odds are stacked against you, because by emphasizing one pointedness, not being able to hear sounds, not being able to even think, "am I in first jhāna"? The meditator is always doubting themselves even though they might be progressing along just fine. Instead of the mind feeling relaxed, spacious, free, it feels like you're trying to stuff it into a tiny box where you can't move, can't breathe, can't think.

Simile of Vism. throwing you into the ocean 

The Vism. way of training for first jhāna, is like teaching someone who doesn't know how to swim, who doesn't even know how to float in the water,  by pushing them into an ocean with strong riptides. "Start flapping your legs and arms and try not to die! That's vitakka and vicara." 

In genuine EBT, it's a gradual training. They start you off in a still, shallow, warm swimming pool, teach you how to float, how to hold your breath, how to hold on to the side of the pool until you get comfortable with floating, etc. 

Try looking up the definition for 'gradual' sometime. It doesn't mean 'abrupt', it doesn't mean 'random', and it doesn't mean 'ass backwards'. If a samādhi training system is gradual, as the Buddha claimed,  then you would expect more than just 'one in a million can do (vism. redefinition of) first jhana', according to vism. 

Instead, in genuine EBT, in AN 5.176 five hundred lay followers attain first jhana by developing vitakka thoughts that arouse piti sukha of first jhana, and they attain stream entry in AN 5.179.

In DN 18, Brahma (who has a lifespan of one aeon and sees 7 Buddhas arising and passing away in this aeon) says that from Magadha, there are at least 2 million stream enterers. You can't attain stream entry without at least a low quality first jhana, so does that sound to you like 'only one in a million' can attain first jhana?

Vism. Redefinition of Jhāna, V&V training method


File:53-gavage-foie-gras-cages-individuelles-France-2012.jpg

File:32-gavage-foie-gras-cages-individuelles-France-2012.jpg

Image result for pa auk meditation hall

EBT authentic Jhāna and V&V training method


File:Gyps Fulvus in flight.jpg

File:Birds flying over a pon in sunset.jpg
File:Birds over Isarkanal.jpg


More images in an alternate version of Vism. bird simile:

 another V&V bird simile corruption by Vism. with some images


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex