It's a great simile, and very accurate. Here's how Vism. and late Theravada Abhidhamma corrupt it to mean something entirely different than a straightforward EBT (early buddhist text) interpretation. Actually, vism. is ambiguous exactly when sukha occurs, but in atthasalini they definitely say sukha is AFTER the drinking and immersion in water is when sukha takes place, killing physical sukha and turning it purely into a mental factor. The standard jhana formula similes, AN 5.28, sukha would be physical pleasure, explicitly confirmed by AN 5.28 commentary as well, older than the Atthasalini, and which Vism. goes out of their way to avoid even mentioning AN 5.28 similes and that commentary.
elsewhere in the thread:
by Dhammanando » Fri Sep 20, 2019 8:45 am
The Visuddhimagga (PoP. ch. IV. 100; also Dhs-a. 117):
Kantārakhinnassa vanantudakadassanasavanesu viya pīti. Vanacchāyāpavesanaudakaparibhogesu viya sukhaṃ.
Pīti is like when a man exhausted in a desert sees or hears about a pond on the edge of a wood. Sukha is like the man's going into the shade of the wood and using the water.
dhs-a is Atthasālinī, a commentary on Dhammasangani (one of the 7 abhdihamma books)
• Pīti is never referred to as a vedanā in any Pali text whatever.
• In the Suttanta Piṭaka pīti is never really defined, except by a list of ten synonyms (i.e., pāmojjaṃ, modanā, āmodanā, pamodanā, hāso, pahāso, vitti, tuṭṭhi, odagyaṃ and attamanatā cittassa), given in the Niddesa and Paṭisambhidāmagga.
• The classification of pīti as an item in saṅkhārakkhandha doesn't originate with the commentaries but goes back to the Abhidhamma Piṭaka's Dhammasaṅgaṇī and Vibhaṅga.
• That the second ānāpānassati tetrad corresponds to vedanānupassanā doesn't oblige us to conclude that the pītipaṭisaṃvedī in this tetrad is a vedanā, for the tetrad also includes cittasaṅkhārapaṭisaṃvedī. Cittasaṅkhārā includes saññā, which is certainly not a vedanā.
Re: looking for citation, pīti and sukha of 4 jhānas compared to dying of thirst, seeing water in distance, and drinking
elsewhere in the thread:
by Dhammanando » Fri Sep 20, 2019 8:45 am
The Visuddhimagga (PoP. ch. IV. 100; also Dhs-a. 117):
Kantārakhinnassa vanantudakadassanasavanesu viya pīti. Vanacchāyāpavesanaudakaparibhogesu viya sukhaṃ.
Pīti is like when a man exhausted in a desert sees or hears about a pond on the edge of a wood. Sukha is like the man's going into the shade of the wood and using the water.
dhs-a is Atthasālinī, a commentary on Dhammasangani (one of the 7 abhdihamma books)
• Pīti is never referred to as a vedanā in any Pali text whatever.
• In the Suttanta Piṭaka pīti is never really defined, except by a list of ten synonyms (i.e., pāmojjaṃ, modanā, āmodanā, pamodanā, hāso, pahāso, vitti, tuṭṭhi, odagyaṃ and attamanatā cittassa), given in the Niddesa and Paṭisambhidāmagga.
• The classification of pīti as an item in saṅkhārakkhandha doesn't originate with the commentaries but goes back to the Abhidhamma Piṭaka's Dhammasaṅgaṇī and Vibhaṅga.
• That the second ānāpānassati tetrad corresponds to vedanānupassanā doesn't oblige us to conclude that the pītipaṭisaṃvedī in this tetrad is a vedanā, for the tetrad also includes cittasaṅkhārapaṭisaṃvedī. Cittasaṅkhārā includes saññā, which is certainly not a vedanā.
Comments
Post a Comment