Skip to main content

The rūpa (physical body) is active in 4 jhānas, not transcended until to arūpa (formless) samādhis

In this article, we'll gloss two key words. Rūpa, and nānatta (diversity).
Glossing the base of infinite space formula,
which is the samadhi attainment right above fourth jhana.
It shows that, if that is the attainment where one transcends sights, sounds, smells,....,
then it means in the 4th jhana, and first through 4th jhana,
one has NOT transcended sights, sounds, smells...,
i.e. the 5 sense faculties of the body are still active.


Glossing Rūpa


♦ 16. piṅgiyamāṇavapucchā (KN 5.71)
5:16  Piṅgiya’s Questions
♦ 1126.
I’m old & weak,
(iccāyasmā piṅgiyo)
my complexion dull,
♦ “jiṇṇohamasmi abalo vītavaṇṇo,
I’ve blurry eyes
♦ nettā na suddhā savanaṃ na phāsu.
and trouble hearing
but may I not perish
♦ māhaṃ nassaṃ momuho antarāva
while still deluded,
confused!
♦ ācikkha dhammaṃ yamahaṃ vijaññaṃ.
Teach me the Dhamma
so that I may know
♦ jātijarāya idha vippahānaṃ”.
the abandoning here
of birth & aging.
♦ 1127.
(piṅgiyāti bhagavā)
The Buddha:
♦ “disvāna rūpesu vihaññamāne,
Seeing people suffering
♦ ruppanti rūpesu janā pamattā.
on account of their bodies—
heedless people are afflicted
♦ tasmā tuvaṃ piṅgiya appamatto,
on account of their bodies
then heedful, Piṅgiya,
♦ jahassu rūpaṃ apunabbhavāya”.
let go of the body
for the sake of no further becoming.




(note this next part appears in MN 10 under kāya anupassana (body contemplation - rupa, sarira, kaya all pointing to anatomical body here)

♦ 172. “puna caparaṃ, bhikkhave, tameva bhaginiṃ passeyya sarīraṃ sivathikāya chaḍḍitaṃ —
"Again, one might see that very same woman as a corpse cast away in a charnel ground —
ekāhamataṃ vā dvīhamataṃ vā tīhamataṃ vā, uddhumātakaṃ vinīlakaṃ vipubbakajātaṃ.
one day, two days, three days dead, bloated, livid, & oozing.
taṃ kiṃ maññatha, bhikkhave, yā purimā subhā vaṇṇanibhā sā antarahitā, ādīnavo pātubhūtoti?
What do you think: Has her earlier beauty & charm vanished, and the drawback appeared?"
‘evaṃ, bhante’.
Yes, lord.
ayampi, bhikkhave, rūpānaṃ ādīnavo.
"This too, monks, is the drawback of forms.


MN 137 glossing nānatta (diversity perceptions)

Katamā ca, bhikkhave, upekkhā nānattā nānattasitā?
And what is equanimity based on diversity?
Atthi, bhikkhave, upekkhā
There is equanimity towards
rūpesu,
sights,
atthi saddesu,
sounds,
atthi gandhesu,
smells,
atthi rasesu,
tastes,
atthi phoṭṭhabbesu—
and touches.
ayaṃ, bhikkhave, upekkhā nānattā nānattasitā.
This is equanimity based on diversity.

Katamā ca, bhikkhave, upekkhā ekattā ekattasitā?
And what is equanimity based on unity?
Atthi, bhikkhave, upekkhā
There is equanimity based on the
ākāsānañcāyatana-nissitā,
dimensions of infinite space,
atthi viññāṇañcāyatana-nissitā,
infinite consciousness,
atthi ākiñcaññāyatana-nissitā,
nothingness, and
atthi neva-saññā-n-āsaññāyatana-nissitā—
neither perception nor non-perception.
ayaṃ, bhikkhave, upekkhā ekattā ekattasitā.
This is equanimity based on unity.

Tatra, bhikkhave, yāyaṃ upekkhā ekattā ekattasitā taṃ nissāya taṃ āgamma yāyaṃ upekkhā nānattā nānattasitā taṃ pajahatha, taṃ samatikkamatha. Evametissā pahānaṃ hoti, evametissā samatikkamo hoti.
Therein, relying on equanimity based on unity, give up equanimity based on diversity. That’s how it is given up.


--jhana is based on perception of "multiplicity of sensory experiences." In practical terms, this means that the mind is in contact with blissful bubbly sensations, surges/currents/confluences/settling of energies; the occasional, gentle impingement of sounds and random tactile sensations don't knock one out of the seclusion peace, but are in general registered as either innocuous, neutral sensations, or a part of the vibrant field of pleasant experience.
The passages also make clear that "singleness" of perception in the formless means the suspension of sensory awareness, and this is made distinct from experiences of the form attainments (the four jhanas).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advice to younger meditators on jhāna, sex, porn, masturbation

Someone asked: Is porn considered harmful sexual.activity? I don't have a sex life because I don't have a partner and I don't wish to engage in casual sex so I use porn to quench the biological urge to orgasm. I can't see that's it's harmful because nobody is being forced into it. The actors are all paid well and claim to enjoy it etc. The only harm I can see is that it's so accessible these days on smart devices and so children may access it but I believe that this is the parents responsibility to not allow unsupervised use of devices etc. Views? Frankk response: In another thread, you asked about pleasant sensations and jhāna.  I'm guessing you're young, so here's some important advice you won't get from suttas   if you're serious about jhāna.  (since monastics are already celibate by rule)   If you want to attain stable and higher jhānas,   celibacy and noble silence to the best of your ability are the feedstock and prerequiste to tha

SN 48.40 Ven. Thanissaro comments on Ven. Sunyo's analysis

This was Ven. Sunyo's analysis of SN 48.40: https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2024/05/exciting-news-honest-ebt-scholars-like.html And here is Ven. Thanissaro's response to that analysis: I think there’s a better way to tackle the issue of SN 48:40 than by appealing to the oldest layers of commentarial literature. That way is to point out that SN 48:40, as we have it, doesn’t pass the test in DN 16 for determining what’s genuine Dhamma and what’s not. There the standard is, not the authority of the person who’s claiming to report the Buddha’s teachings, but whether the teachings he’s reporting are actually in accordance with the principles of the Dhamma that you know. So the simple fact that those who have passed the Buddha’s teachings down to us say that a particular passage is what the Buddha actually taught is not sufficient grounds for accepting it. In the case of the jhānas—the point at issue here— we have to take as our guide the standard formula for the jhānas, a

1min. video: Dalai Lama kissing boy and asking him to suck his tongue

To give more context, this is a public event,  * everyone knows cameras are rolling  *  it's a room full of children * the boy's mom is standing off camera a few feet away watching all of this * the boy initiated contact, he had already had a hug with Dalai Lama earlier and then asked Dalai Lama for another hug which triggered this segment  17 min. video showing what happened before that 1 min. clip and after, with some explanation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT0qey5Ts78 16min talk from Ajahn Acalo with his thoughts on Dalai Lama kissing boy, relevance to Bhikkhu monastic code, sexual predators in religion in general, and how celibate monastics deal with sexual energy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uK2m0TcUib0 The child's comments about the incident in a filmed interview later https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/world-news/2023/04/18/643eba5d46163ffc078b457c.html The child: It's a great experience It was amazing to meet His Holiness and I think it's a great ex