original corrupted pali CST 4
MN 2, 2. bhikkhuvaggo, 6. laṭukikopamasuttaṃ (MN 66.1), para. 13 ⇒
idampi kho ahaṃ, udāyi, iñjitasmiṃ vadāmi.
| This belongs to what is not imperturbable, I say. |
Kiñca tattha iñjitasmiṃ?
| And what there belongs to what is not imperturbable? |
Yadeva tattha pītisukhaṃ aniruddhaṃ hoti idaṃ tattha iñjitasmiṃ.
| Whatever rapture and bliss has not ceased there is what belongs to what is not imperturbable. |
Idhudāyi, bhikkhu pītiyā ca virāgā … pe … tatiyaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja viharati;
| Take a mendicant who, with the fading away of rapture, enters and remains in the third absorption. |
idampi kho ahaṃ, udāyi, iñjitasmiṃ vadāmi.
| This pertains to what is not imperturbable. |
Kiñca tattha iñjitasmiṃ?
| And what there pertains to what is not imperturbable? |
Yadeva tattha upekkhāsukhaṃ aniruddhaṃ hoti idaṃ tattha iñjitasmiṃ.
| Whatever equanimous bliss has not ceased there is what pertains to what is not imperturbable. |
Idhudāyi, bhikkhu sukhassa ca pahānā … pe … catutthaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja viharati;
| Take a mendicant who, giving up pleasure and pain, enters and remains in the fourth absorption. |
That's obvious nonsense contradicting basic EBT. upekkha (upa + ikkhati) means, equanimous-observation. It's a vipassana jhana factor that first becomes prominent in 3rd jhana, continues into 4th jhana, is present and continues through first three arupa samadhi attainments and all 7 perception/sañña meditation attainments. (see MN 111).
It contradicts the basic STED 3rd jhana formula, where upekkha and sukha are INDEPENDENT factors, not entwined codependently as "upekkha-sukha" equanimous-pleasure.
If we were to qualify what the sukha is, it's not upekkha pleasure, it's bodily pleasure, as in:
(STED 3rd Jhāna)
🚫😁 pītiyā ca virāgā
| 🚫😁(with) Rapture ** fading, |
👁 upekkhako ca viharati
| 👁 Equanimously-observing ** (he) dwells, |
(S&S🐘💭) sato ca sam-pajāno,
| (S&S🐘💭) (he is a) Rememberer, (a) lucid-discerner, |
🙂🚶 sukhañca kāyena paṭi-saṃ-vedeti,
| 🙂🚶 pleasure with-the-body (he) experiences, |
yaṃ taṃ ariyā ācikkhanti —
| that those Noble-Ones declare - |
‘upekkhako satimā sukha-vihārī’ti
| “(He is an) equanimous-observer (and a) Rememberer, (he has) pleasurable-abiding.” |
🌖 tatiyaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja viharati.
| 🌖 third Jhāna (he) enters, dwells. |
MN 66 fixed (on next update to lucid24.org)
idampi kho ahaṃ, udāyi, iñjitasmiṃ vadāmi.
| This belongs to what is not imperturbable, I say. |
Kiñca tattha iñjitasmiṃ?
| And what there belongs to what is not imperturbable? |
Yadeva tattha pītisukhaṃ aniruddhaṃ hoti idaṃ tattha iñjitasmiṃ.
| Whatever rapture and bliss has not ceased there is what belongs to what is not imperturbable. |
Idhudāyi, bhikkhu pītiyā ca virāgā … pe … tatiyaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja viharati;
| Take a mendicant who, with the fading away of rapture, enters and remains in the third absorption. |
idampi kho ahaṃ, udāyi, iñjitasmiṃ vadāmi.
| This pertains to what is not imperturbable. |
Kiñca tattha iñjitasmiṃ?
| And what there pertains to what is not imperturbable? |
Yadeva tattha sukhaṃ aniruddhaṃ hoti idaṃ tattha iñjitasmiṃ.
| Whatever pleasure has not ceased there is what pertains to what is not imperturbable. |
Idhudāyi, bhikkhu sukhassa ca pahānā … pe … catutthaṃ jhānaṃ upasampajja viharati;
| Take a mendicant who, giving up pleasure and pain, enters and remains in the fourth absorption. |
3 down, 3 to go.
https://notesonthedhamma.blogspot.com/2019/08/what-is-upekkha-sukha-every-sutta-that.html
No comments:
Post a Comment